Friday, December 18, 2015

Assistance Package 161j

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# I forgot, I just added a third section to the amendment. It reads as follows:
You can't do that, Oliver - notwithstanding that there is no Amendment.

# 3. Anyone in Australia who supports, partakes in, or engages in neurodiversity shall be extradited to the United States, and be beheaded without the benefit of a trial.
The US Constitution has no power over residents of Australia.

# That means you, fuckwit. You are going to DIE. And you know what? I've had enough. I am going to kill you.
This is a blatant and direct death threat on the back of incitement three years ago.

# I will use my recently purchased gun, and I will simply tell Australian customs agents that I am going dingo hunting.
Australia is known for strong gun laws and upon investigation I found that the importation of an AK-47 would be impossible.

# Just as some perform a citizen's arrest, I will perform a citizen's execution.
There is no such thing.

# You are the worst person on earth, worst than Hitler and Osama bin Laden combined. I will be a hero when I kill you.
No you won't, you will be a convicted murderer.

# You have committed crimes against humanity, and you deserve the death penalty.
There is no proof of this.

# Thousands of little boys will be safe when you are dead because you won't be able to rape them anymore.
This is again proven to be defamatory.

# My male therapist knows that I plan to kill you, and he says that it's totally ok.
No therapist would ever approve of such a plan.

# You cannot prank call the mental health agency again because my therapist is on my side.
That would make no difference.

# Also, I no longer live at my former address (I'm not giving you my new one), which is why I thankfully wasn't home when they showed up last time due to your fraudulent call.
There is no proof of this claim.

# You have made my life a living Hell, and you will pay for it with your life.
No, Oliver, you have made your own life like that.

# I realize that calling for your death is not possible (the FBI thwarted that plan last time), so I must carry it out myself.
No you must not. What you must do is stop lying and defaming people and lying about Autism and neurodiversity.

# I wouldn't care if I had to spend the rest of my life in prison.
Yes you would.

# The only thing that could possibly deter me is the death penalty.
That shows an awareness that he knows he is doing wrong and yet is doing it anyway.

# Thankfully, Australia is such a backwards nation that it abolished the death penalty over 30 years ago.
That's not backwards. That's progressive.

# If I make it back to US soil, I will be a free man.
No you won't. You'll serve your time in prison.

# If I am caught before I arrive at the airport, so be it.
Hopefuly he will, and with this notice given I am pretty sure he will.

# Any prison sentence would be offset by the immense happiness that your death would cause me.
And your happiness would be offset by the knowledge that you will lose your family's respect.

# I will take great pride at each bullet I fire into your body until you die.
This is vulgar and sick.

# Also, you cannot call the police on me this time, as the Supreme Court has ruled in Elonis v. United States that threatening to kill someone is constitutionally protected free speech.
No they didn't.

# I am simply exercising my First Amendment rights, and the Supreme Court says so.
In that instance, no they didn't.

# So there is nothing you can do about it, Phil Gluyas.
I feel sure there is plenty he can do about it and I hope he does.

# You are going to DIE, motherfucker, and the world will be a better place as a result.
Oliver, the world will be a better place if you would just be quiet.

# Phil Gluyas: Please stop posing as a Hawaiian.
There is no proof of this claim.

# I am still coming to Australia to kill you, and saying so is my constitutional right. Enough said.
And it can get you arrested and convicted of criminal threats.

# You go, Ruby! Show everyone that he's the bastard we already know him to be.
There is no proof of this claim.

# Yes, you are indeed Phil Gluyas. And you are going to die.
Again, there is no proof and another threat of death.

# That really sucks. I could've sworn that was Phil Gluyas because nobody else talks that way.
Many people talk that way, and the commenter was using American spelling, not Australian/English.

# Are you sure he wasn't using a proxy?
This is paranoid.

# That's a good point. I guess he did spell "color" without the u. I'm so used to seeing words spelled the American way that I don't bother to think twice.
That's your problem, Oliver. You don't think at all.

# Phil Gluyas: You are about as much of a woman as Bruce Jenner, although it makes sense that you'd become a Trans Gendered person as your father is one and so is your husband Lee.
It's Kaitlyn Jenner, Oliver, and there is no proof of that outrageous claim about Phil's family.

# This is quite dreadful, as many men claim to be trans in order to use the lady's restroom and molest children.
There is no proof of this claim.

# While I know that you already rape little boys, it would not surprise me if you preyed on girls as well.
This is defamatory again.

# I remember one time that John Best rightfully called you out when you made a sexual pass online at a 16-year-old Japanese girl, so I definitely think it could be true.
There is no proof of such a claim.

# The fact that you are a gay rapist like Jerry Sandusky, and now a trans pedophile to boot is cause for great concern, and justifies your death even more.
No it doesn't and besides this is proven defamation again.

# Now to take apart the rest of your bullshit. A cure is indeed a service, and a priceless one at that.
No it's not, it's murder.

# It is not a denial of God's work.
It is.

# Would you say that about curing cancer or AIDS or Lou Gehrig's disease? Yeah, I didn't think so.
Of course not because unlike Autism they are diseases that can kill.

# Autism is a disease, just like those three.
No it is not.

# It is definitely not a part of being human.
Yes it is.

# In fact, it can and does prevent people from being fully human, and that is truly tragic.
Nothing prevents a person from being fully human.

# "Diversity" is simply a code word for affirmative action, which autism definitely is not.
No it's a practical statement of fact.

# Neurodiversity is a cult against curing autism run by gay pedophiles such as Phil Gluyas, Nick Dubin, Landon Bryce, and Steve Silberman.
That is again defamation against Phil, and also Landon and Steve. Dubin of course is a convicted pedophile.

# The reason they don't want autism cured is simple: more nonverbal autistic boys equals more "perfect victims."
This is utter nonsense.

# That is quite sickening, and is the primary reason why neurodiversity must be outlawed.
No it is not a reason because the reason does not exist.

# Research into a cure does not divert funds from services, and not all services can offer improvement for everyone.
All services offer improvement and research into a cure does divert funds.

# The CDC wouldn't track stats for autism if it wasn't a disease.
Yes they would because it is a mental health consideration for which the CDC has jurisdiction.

# Like I said before, it's not the Center for Difference Control.
Actually it is in a way.

# I do in fact have a male therapist, and he is in full agreement with me that you need to die.
Again, this has to be a lie.

# If he thought I was unstable, he would be obligated to report me to the authorities.
And the fact that he hasn't lends itself to the beliefe that there is no male therapist.

# Thankfully, he understands the truth, which is why your prank call to the mental health agency fell on deaf ears.
There is no proof of this.

# I have been seeing him for nearly five years, and I owe a lot of my success to him.
What success?

# For example, I was still a virgin when I started seeing him, thinking that I would never get pussy due to my autism.
And there is no proof that you have, Oliver.

# He was able to convince me that that wasn't the case, and I lost my virginity only months after I started seeing him despite my autism.
Again, there is no proof of this.

# I am fully aware of the truth, unlike you. The truth is that autism needs to be cured, and you need to die.
The truth is that autism does not need a cure and no one needs to die.

# I suggest you go try and live whatever you have left of your life, as the exact time and date of my trip to Australia to kill you will be kept secret for obvious reasons.
I suggest, Oliver, that you check yourself in to hospital immediately. This is disgusting.

# Get off the Internet and stop attacking people.
Take your own advice, Oliver.

# Go out and actually do something.
According to his website he does, and a lot more than Oliver does.

# And no, raping little boys on the Australian rules football diamond like Jerry Sandusky and suing people does not count as doing something.
The last one does count, and one more thing. Upon investigation Australian rules football is not played on a diamond. That's baseball.

# I'm still not convinced. I mean, how many people believe the same crazy shit he does?
As someone else quickly added, everyone believes the same thing Hono-Lulu does except for Oliver and his friends.

# Nope, you're wrong. The truth is that neurodiversity is bad. Every sane person knows that.
Every sane person knows that neurodiversity represents all members of the human race.

# Anons: Nope. I tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help me God.
No you don't, Oliver. You are a barefaced liar.

# I am not an idiot. I am quite smart, and my IQ is 146.
You're not showing those IQ points, Oliver.

# Neurodiversity is definitely not cool.
Of course it's cool.

# Many Germans thought Nazism was "cool" and look how that turned out.
Actually most of them didn't. They were just too scared to fight it until the Third Reich was destroyed by the Allies.

# I'm trying to put a damper on neurodiversity before it gets too out of hand.
You'll never achieve that, Oliver. There is too much opposition.

# Matt Hogan: I am not insane. I'm definitely not a jerk, and neurodiversity is horrible.
All of this is demonstrably incorrect.

# Thankfully, most people are on my side.
No they are not.

# They just can't speak and are being mercilessly taken advantage of by neurodiversity, sexually and otherwise.
No, Oliver, you are hurting them.

This assistance shall continue.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Assistance Package 161i

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# You do NOT call me a cunt. That is intolerable.
No it's not. Vulgar, yes, but not intolerable.

# For that, I am going to kill you.
And another death threat. That's a total of five now.

# I have already purchased an AK-47 and I am going to use it to end your life.
Such a weapon is used only by enemies of the United States, given that it originated in the Soviet Union.

# You can Google both of them. They are members of the California state bar.
A check reveals that this is not the case at all.

# Yes, my father does practice in Beverly Hills.
There is no proof of this.

# My mother has a different surname than I do.
Unless there has been a divorce (for which there is no indication) this is not possible.

# You have no fucking clue what you're talking about, asshole.
Abuse doesn't make your claim true, Oliver.

# Everything I have said is the God's honest truth, and you do not own a gun.
The first claim is demonstrably false and the second is an assumption with no proof.

# After the Elliot Rodger shooting, the California state legislature passed a law making it illegal for anyone with autism or Asperger's to purchase a firearm, and the bill was signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September of last year.
The changes made in September 2014 did not include this rubbish claim, and if it was true Oliver could not own an AK-47.

# You need to be institutionalized for the sake of society.
No, Oliver, that will be you if you continue on this path.

# Go suck a dick, faggot.
A cheap insult.

# Gov. Brown signed the concealed weapon bill long before the Elliot Rodger shooting.
This is a lie. Brown signed this bill this past October.

# Completely different law.
Not to the law the anonymous person was pointing to it isn't.

# You have admitted to owning a gun, which is a crime here in California.
No it's not, unless certain criteria isn't fulfilled. Otherwise it would violate the second Amendment.

# I will be reporting you to the California Department of Game and Fish, and they will arrest you for illegal weapons possession.
Oliver that is the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and they have no jurisdiction over this matter. It was Fish and Game until the end of 2012.

# Have fun getting assraped in prison, fuckwit.
Another stereotype uttered by this poor excuse for a human being.

# Nope. I have never committed a crime in my life.
The Criminal Canby blog says otherwise.

# Nope. Owning a gun is protected under the 2nd Amendment, and free speech (including death threats) are protected under the 1st Amendment.
Death threats are not protected by the First Amendment as they are criminal threats.

# No, I'm not a hypocrite. Is that a threat?
Yes you are, Oliver, and there was no threat.

# Owning a gun is a crime if you have Asperger's.
As previously stated, this is a rubbish claim.

# Gov. Brown signed the legislation after the Elliot Rodger shooting.
As previously stated this was not the case.

# The Constitution does not apply to people with Asperger's, as it only applies to humans and autistic people are fully subhuman.
This is an extremely bigoted and irrational statement.

# I am definitely not a hypocrite. Making a contradictory statement does not make one a hypocrite. A hypocrite is one who preaches one thing yet practices another.
Which is exactly what you are doing, Oliver.

# Matt Hogan: Did you just call me a germ-filled monster? Look who's talking now.
I rather think the world would agree with Matt Hogan at this point.

# Anon: I am not a criminal, and I have never been convicted, tried, or even arrested.
Just because he hasn't been tried doesn't mean he isn't a criminal. There are many criminals who are yet to be caught.

# I'm not a hypocrite, and I do follow the law.
You don't, Oliver. Death threats are against the law.

# U am far from a bigot, simply a realist.
There is a clear typo here. Being a realist is a low excuse for being a neurobigot.

# There is such a thing as being subhuman. Why don't you take a look in the mirror and you'll know what I'm talking about.
That's advice that you should take yourself, Oliver

# Patriot: I am not a Communist. I am a member of the Republican party.
Both major political parties have been infiltrated by Communists in the past.

# As I have said multiple times before, I am not a Communist.
The more you deny it, Oliver, the more true it becomes.

# A gun cannot possibly have a political ideology as it is an inanimate object.
The AK-47 does.

# Anon: Convicted of what? Oh wait, nothing? That's right.
No, wrong. As the Criminal Canby blog ably demonstrates as has already been mentioned.

# You're delusional, dude. Get yourself the help you so desperately need.
Oliver, that is you that you are describing.

# Patriot: Russia hasn't been Communist since 1991.
This is not true. Russia remains Communist to this day, albeit a different version.

# That's before I was even born. Although I am not a Communist, being one is protected under the First Amendment.
No it's not. Communism remains contrary to American freedom and it's second worst enemy after Islamic State.

# I have not threatened anyone, and I don't have possession of any type of illegal weapon.
You have, Oliver, and you said you owned an AK-47 - which is an illegal weapon.

# Anon: It is not illegal. It is protected under the 2nd Amendment, as are all guns.
Not the AK-47. It's a weapon used by terrorists and revolutionaries.

# Those statements are not criminal threats; merely constitutionally protected free speech.
No, they were direct criminal threats.

# The Supreme Court actually ruled that to be true this year.
No they didn't.

# Patriot: It sure is. Any religion, philosophy, or political belief is covered, no matter how abhorrent it may be.
Communism isn't.

# Patriot: Very funny. I can always use a good laugh.
In fact, a visit from the military would be consistent with possession of a terrorist weapon, so don't laugh.

# Anons: Talk about a threat. Someone might need to go the psych ward........
Yes, Oliver, you do.

# You are both idiots. You NEVER tell another human to commit suicide. EVER.
And yet you are claiming that believing in neurodiversity is suicide in effect. Inconsistent as always.

# For someone who claims to be an ND, you sure are a hypocrite for supporting the Judge Rotenberg Center.
There is no proof that the statement made was by a supporter of neurodiversity.

# To the anon whose comment I accidentally rejected earlier, threats to kill are constitutionally protected free speech.
No they are not.

# Google Elonis v. United States if you don't believe me.
And read it properly, Oliver.

# 1. Saying everyone is ND is like saying that all blacks are Democrats. It's simply not true.
Bad comparison as usual.

# 2. If you tell someone to commit suicide, and they do it, you can be charged with manslaughter.
Only if the instruction is malicious.

# You have been permanently banned from commenting on this blog.
Oh dear another act of denial of the First Amendment.

# Although you very cleary are a member of neurodiversity, I most certainly am not, as I have accepted the fact that autism is a horrendous disease that needs to be cured.
No, Oliver, that is a misnomer and a lot of lies as well about Autism.

# Thankfully the 28th Amendment is pending, which will criminalize neurodiversity and will mandate the death penalty for all members.
No it is not pending at all.

# 1. No, it's not. Only if it can be proven that it was a murder for hire.
This again is not true.

# 2. No, you have a fundamental misunderstanding what "neurodiversity" means.
Oliver, you are distorting the true meaning of neurodiversity to suit your own warped agenda.

# It doesn't mean "brain difference" as its etymology would imply. Of course everyone's brain is different. That's nothing new.
That is neurodiversity as it was originally coined in the 1990's.

# What neurodiversity really means is enacting a ban on a cure for autism, at the expense of those so low-functioning that they cannot live without a cure.
That is completely false and scaremongering of a very sick kind.

# Denying a cure to someone with a severe disease like autism is a human rights abuse, and should be punished with the death penalty.
Autism is not a disease, and to call it a disease is a human ights abuse.

You don't, Oliver, and there is no proof that the comment was from that person.

# You are wrong about neurodiversity, you god damn cocksucking faggot!
Why is it that when Oliver is angry he uses homophobic abuse?

# I do indeed support services for autistic people, including a cure. Supporting a cure does not mean opposing services.
Yes it does because it means there are no services available to help those with Autism as all the money is going where it shouldn't be going.

# The two are not mutually exclusive.
Yes they are.

# It will not change no matter how many times you lie about it you disgusting pedophile.
I happen to know thanks to a January court decision that this is proven to be defamatory.

# Autism is indeed a disease, and is identified as such by the CDC.
No it is not.

# It isn't the Center for Difference Control. It has nothing to do with skin color, hair color, eye color, or gender.
It has.

# Those are differences, not diseases.
Yes, and Autism is a difference.

# Autism is a disease, and you calling it merely a "difference" trivializes the horrible illness that it is.
It is not an illness at all.

# But you would rather little boys remain autistic so you can rape them on the Australian rules football diamond, huh?
That is another proven defamatory statement if I remember.

# The real world, which you are not a part of, rightly believes that autism is a disease, and is working on discovering a cure.
This is again completely false.

# The amendment will not kill the human race, only neurodiversity.
Killing neurodiversity means killing the whole human race.

This assistance shall continue

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Assistance Package 161h

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# Zexcoiler Kingbolt: So you’re Latino then, huh? I bet you don’t even speak a word of Spanish
Another presumptive remark.

# Lyle: You are indeed Phil Gluyas commenting under a different name. Go suck a dick, faggot.
There is no proof of either claim and it was also very childish.

# Zexcoiler Kingbolt: Yeah, it kinda pisses me off that I can’t type accents too. I can on my phone, though.
There are ways around that so this is a social error.

# Do not call me a son of a bitch. I have a very good education, and that is actually how I learned to speak Spanish fluently.
There is no proof that Oliver can speak Spanish fluently, and I think we know he does not have a good education.

# If you really are Latino, you should’ve spoken Spanish from birth, not learned it in school like I did.
That's another presumptive remark.

# I’m white, so I get a pass for that.
That is tantamount to reverse racism.

# Something needs to be done about that bastard. He can’t keep getting away with all his bullshit anymore.
This reads like a threat, although this isn't a death threat as per previously.

# I’m only asking this because my ex-girlfriend is a native Spanish speaker and she didn’t speak a word of English until she was in 6th grade.
There is no proof of the claim that Oliver has an ex girlfriend that fits this description.

# I only recently got a comment from that user; I hadn’t deleted any previous comment by someone of that name.
The new blog says otherwise. A comment from someone under that name was indeed deleted.

# I won’t publish the comment as that user is clearly just looking for trouble.
As proven by the new blog, all they are doing is calling Oliver out. Oliver is the one making trouble.

# People tell me that I speak Spanish very well for someone who learned it as a second language.
There is no proof of this claim.

# That’s exactly what my ex said, which is why she was so impressed that I could actually speak Spanish for real.
If this was true, why is she an ex now? For this reason I call this claim unproven also.

# I think I held my own against them pretty well, actually.
No, Oliver, as the anonymous person observed they were destroying you.

# However, everyone who is part of that cult against me is now permanently banned from this blog.
I don't think that makes a difference. The damage has been done.

Oliver did make one more comment accusing the anonymous commenter of arguing for the sake of arguing and insisting that he won the argument - against all sense and logic. However he deleted it before I could record it, and he deleted all the other comments he made from this package. But he soon returned;

# Then you must be a member of neurodiversity. Have fun being executed!
There will be no executions.

# I'm not on a "killing kick," and I won't be the one performing the executions.
This doesn't matter. Oliver wants people to die. He just doesn't want to do it himself.

# They will be performed by a licensed executioner under the law.
No they won't, because there won't be any.

# Executing someone is a very solemn duty, and those tasked with performing it certainly don't get any kicks out of it.
It shouldn't be happening no matter what.

# No, I actually don't want people to die. In fact, it pains me that these people will have to be executed.
It is safe to say that this is a complete fabrication.

# But committing a crime as horrible as neurodiversity deserves the ultimate punishment.
No it doesn't.

# DLeeHarley: Your comments make no sense. Please specify what you mean.
I can answer that. He believes that Oliver should be executed.

# Anon #1: You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of my intention.
No he understood it very well.

# I do not plan to kill anyone myself, as I am not an officer of the law and do not intend to become one.
As already stated, this does not matter.

# The executions will be carried out by a licensed executioner at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, and by no one else and at no other location.
There will be no executions.

# Also, my proposed amendment is not intended to criminalize being brain damaged.
Yes it does.

# On the contrary, I have the utmost sympathy for those people and am on their side in the fight against neurodiversity.
The brain damaged are neurodiverse, so no you are not on their side at all.

# Also just FYI, neurodiversity strongly rejects referring to autism as "brain damage," so I can't really tell if you're one of them or not.
Autism isn't, but untreated regressions are.

# Anon #2: I do, in fact, seek to educate.
This is laughable because all he has done is educate us in his foolishness and nothing else.

# That is what I have been doing on this blog for the past five and a half years.
No you haven't, Oliver.

# If someone was willing to renounce neurodiversity, that would definitely be grounds for a pardon or commutation.
No one will renounce neurodiversity and there is no reason to punish anyone for believing in it.

# In my opinion, neurodiversity should be a crime and should warrant the death penalty.
No it should not in either respect.

# That would be good.
Making Autism illegal, which is what this is in reply to, would not be good at all.

# I still think that denying someone a cure is akin to denying them their life, which is why I think it warrants the death penalty.
This insinuates that Autism kills, which it does not.

# Yuval actually is a proud supporter of Donald Trump.
That's a bad thing, not a good thing.

# Do you know something that I don't? There's no evidence at all that "neurodiversity" was the target of the San Bernardino shooting, and you saying that I incited it is libel.
The attack was on a facility for the developmentally disabled, which would have included people with Autism. The assertion is valid - correct or not.

# Although I would prefer firing squad as a method of execution, the Supreme Court has held that it violates the 8th Amendment, so lethal injection will have to do.
It won't do, at all.

# No, it doesn't. The Supreme Court has held multiple times that the death penalty is constitutional, which is why it is still legal.
In many circumstances the death penalty is not constitutional.

# That is why the Constitution must be amended to allow it, and I have proposed such an amendment to fix that.
No it must not be amended to allow the murder of innocent people.

# Anon: You're wrong, and you're incredibly stupid. I feel bad for how dumb you are.
Oliver looks lame for making this statement.

# A constitutional amendment cannot possibly be found unconstitutional because it is an AMENDMENT.
It has already been explained to Oliver that this is not the case.

# It literally changes what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional.
It's rather more complex than that simplistic assumption.

# Under your perverse logic, the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional because it violates the three-fifths compromise clause.
It's not.

# Honestly, you need to grow a brain.
Oliver is the one who needs this function.

# Troy Mullane: I am going to come to your house and kill you. You are going to die, motherfucker!
Another death threat. This is pathetic.

# You are a disgusting Abo who has no place on this earth, and your existence is in clear violation of the White Australia policy.
A brief Google search reveals that the White Australia policy was abolished well before Oliver was even born.

# Anon: Quite the contrary. The pot is calling the kettle black. You are the one making a fool of yourself, and you likely aren't even from this country.
There is no proof of this claim.

# The word amendment means change, so yes, it literally changes the Constitution.
No it adds to it.

# It is not simply a new law. The Supreme Court cannot find a constitutional amendment to be unconstitutional.
Yes it can. That is it's job, to interpret the Constitution and correct anomalies.

# Scratcher: Syncompac is in fact Troy Mullane. The Informer says so. Therefore, it must be true.
There is no proof of this claim either.

# You're an idiot. First of all, nothing can be "struck out" in the United States. That's a British term.
It's a legal term, which applies in all countries.

# Only a baseball player can be struck out.
And a law or constitutional change that is unconstitutional.

# What you mean to say is overturned, but that is not possible as I have said before.
It is possible.

# The 14th Amendment is specifically what overturned the three-fifths compromise.
No, nothing overturned it.

# It gave black peoples full citizenship, whereas they had previously only counted as three fifths of a person in the census.
That was the census and the census only.

# The Supreme Court has no power to overturn a constitutional amendment.
Yes they do.

# If my proposed amendment is ratified, it shall become law and there's nothing you can do about it.
No it can be challenged and struck out as unconstitutional.

# The only way an amendment can be repealed is via another constitutional amendment, as the 18th Amendment was via the 21st Amendment.
And by a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States stating that an Amendment is unconstitutional.

# You are just so stupid, dude. Get help. Seriously.
I rather think that Oliver is talking about himself. Seriously.

# Not true. Nobody in the US says "struck out" unless they're talking about baseball.
This is demonstrably false.

# Maybe "struck down," but never "struck out."
This is also demonstrably false.

# Overturn can refer to a lower court's decision, or to a piece of legislation being found unconstitutional.
And an Amendment that is equally unconstitutional.

# Both my parents are lawyers and I have sufficient legal knowledge from them.
Such knowledge is not inherited, and there is no proof of the initial claim anyway.

This assistance shall continue.