Assistance Package 161q

This is a continuation and conclusion of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#Killah: No, you are male, and you are quite delusional.
You have no proof of that, Oliver.

#These are not empty threats, and I have filed a police report based on your IP address.
That's impossible if the IP address never appeared.

#Stop saying that I'm trying to scare you because I'm not. I don't scare anyone and that's not how I roll.
You are trying in order to stop people from objecting to your comments.

#I am insane.
Aha! This is what happens when someone is under pressure. They admit the truth and that's the only reason I've added this.

#A few weeks ago, Phil Gluyas prank called the mental health department (again), and this time I actually spoke with them.
I don't doubt Phil's action but I do doubt Oliver spoke to them.

#They judged me to be sane, which is why I am still here writing this blog.
No they never spoke to you.

#They are professionals, and must be taken at their word.
The only word being asked to be taken here is yours, Oliver, and we know that is not reliable.

#You continue to threaten me with death.
No Killah doesn't.

#You know what? I've had enough. I'm going to kill you. I will cut your head off with a saw.
That's a stupid paranoid reaction that proves Oliver is scared.

#I don't kill women, but you are a man so I will have no problem killing you.
Yes you will because you have to find Killah first.

#Anon: Him, not her. Please use the correct pronouns.
The anon is giving Killah the benefit of the doubt as is their right.

#I have not held the Killah hostage, and I never claimed to know where he lived.
That is not what the anon meant and you know it, Oliver.

#I reported him based on his IP address, and the police were able to trace where he lived. They will arrest him, not me.
That is a lie as the service provider would not co-operate due to privacy restrictions.

#Informer: Yeah, he did. That's what he was referring to when he mentioned my dad.
I don't understand this comment, but I'll wager it's another lie.

#Fortunately, the mental health department saw through his bullshit and took my side.
There is no proof of this claim.

#I just changed the comment settings.
He didn't.

#Killah: The fact that you are a man cannot change no matter what you say. Same goes for Bruce Jenner.
Caitlyn Jenner.

#I do indeed have your IP address. You're in Australia and you are Phil Gluyas.
I seriously doubt that.

#I made no such confession, and I am 100% sane.
Yes you did, Oliver, as I recorded above.

#Anon: Are you one of those transgender SJWs? If so you can fuck off.
This is another paranoid remark.

#You're a liar. I just saw your IP address on StatCounter.
Bruce went to the comments directly as he stated, so Oliver is lying.

#No, I did not make it up.
Yes you did, Oliver.

#Its are posted on StatCounter for weeks afterward.
It never appeared on Stat Counter.

#I don't check this blog every minute of every day, and I only checked StatCounter when I noticed there was a comment.
And there would have been nothing.

#Also, I don't know any killers, male or female.
Apparently you know "Killah".

#Sir, I don't you because I don't know any killers.
This should be "I don't know you" and it is made clear that he does know Killah.

#I did indeed change the settings, as you should be able to see by commenting here.
This is actually true, but it would appear that the link from the blog owned by Truthmeister still works.

#I am not lying you motherfucker.
There is no need for this sort of language.

#I changed the comment settings from "full page" to "embedded" last night.
Again, whilst this is true it has changed nothing.

#You need to stop threatening me with death immediately.
There has been no actual death threat.

#For a second, I'm gonna humor your bullshit and pretend that you really do know me. What's your real name then, huh?
He asks this question, and then prevents the answer from being given (see below).

#That's right, you're just a pathetic troll. Either put up or shut up.
That comment could only have been made by a troll, Oliver.

#You can take your "strong advice" and shove it up your ass.
No, Oliver, you should take the advice.

#I have not been "burned" as I have clearly held my own on here.
No you haven't. You've been destroyed.

#I have won every single argument had on this blog.
No, Oliver, you lost each and every one of them.

#The reason everyone left is because I defeated them and they cowered in defeat. Good riddance to them.
No, Oliver, you banned them because you were losing.

#I am going to lock down this thread now as everyone is abusing their commenting privileges.
The only person abusing their commenting privileges, Oliver, is you - and this is the petulant act of a child who lost a fair fight.

With the locking of the thread, Assistance Package 161 is finally complete. This assistance shall continue upon the appearance of a new entry on Oliver's blog, should there be any lies or social errors to be corrected. Thank you for reading.

Assistance Package 161p

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#I did not claim to lose my virginity in order to avoid being called gay.
On the contrary this is another valid reason to make such a claim.

#I was never gay, even when I was still a virgin.
There is no proof either way of this.

#I claimed to have lost it because I did, not because someone called me gay.
There is no proof that you lost it, Oliver.

#I didn't lose it until over a year after I started this blog, and I've been called gay since elementary school so the two have nothing to do with each other.
They have much to do with each other.

#My story about losing it has always been consistent, and nobody ever called me out on it.
Yes they have.

#It's not a lie. It was around the time that I lost my virginity that I started changing my message, but it was a slow and gradual process.
You never changed your message, except to remove the argument that being autistic prevents sex and that wasn't much.

#I will make one concession, however. When I lost my virginity, I said that I wasn't autistic because I thought that I must have been misdiagnosed.
No, you imputed that you were cured.

#I now know that that is not the case, so I will concede to neurodiversity that it is possible for some autistic people to lose their virginity.
It is possible for all of them to have sex.

#That doesn't change the fact that it is still a problem for many autistic people (e.g. Elliot Rodger), and that autism still needs to be cured.
This is where the argument never changed, contrary to Oliver's view. And again, Rodger was not autistic.

#I also naively thought that losing my virginity would magically change everything, which it of course did not.
It didn't change anything at all, because it never happened.

#I'm still autistic and I still need a cure, whether I lost my virginity or not.
You don't need a cure for autism.

*BLOG NOTE; Oliver posted links to his diploma, but they don't work because he doesn't have a diploma.

#No, none of those are lies and you know it.
They were all lies. He never contacted the Congresswomen, Tylenol is not lethal, he is trying scare people, hyena is not a racist term and neurodiversity is the whole human race.

#1. Maxine Waters, Dianne Feinstein, and Barbara Boxer are not "women," they are Congresswomen, and they can all be easily contacted through their websites.
And Oliver never did this.

#2. Tylenol is indeed lethal when it is combined with alcohol.
But it's not when it's not, which is 99 percent of the time.

#3. I am not now nor have ever attempted to scare anyone. That is not how I roll.
The death threats issued and the death penalty desired tells a different story.

#Proposing a constitutional amendment is not a scare tactic.
When it involves a death penalty, it is a scare tactic. Death penalties are designed to deter.

#If anyone was scared by my actions, then that is their own problem.
Oliver is failing to take responsibility for his actions.

#4. It is indeed racist to call someone a hyena, as hyenas live in Africa which is where black people originated.
The logic failure here is astounding.

#5. Neurodiversity is absolutely not the human race; it is the name of a political movement, and a very dangerous one at that. This is perhaps the most ridiculous of all your accusations.
It's not ridiculous. The true meaning of neurodiversity is not a political movement.

#I want the people to die out of punishment, not as a scare tactic.
It's the same thing.

#I am not trying to scare them at all.
Yes you are.

#I do need a cure, and to deny me one is a human rights abuse.
You do not need a cure for autism. No one does.

#I have a good attitude, unlike you.
This is another lie.

#God what an idiot. He's gonna pay this time.
That's another threat, albeit not a death threat.

#No, they're wrong. I'm not an idiot. I'm very smart, and my IQ is 146.
That doesn't prove you are actually smart, Oliver. IQ points are only as good as how you use them.

#It is quite ironic that Phil Gluyas continues to use a word that is known to be a pejorative toward people with mental disabilities, and yet he claims to be "tolerant." Go figure that one out.
It is not known by any such definition anymore, and this isn't the first time Oliver has made this error.

#I am neither a fool nor senseless.
You are both, Oliver.

#The word has always been and continues to be a slur toward people with mental disabilities.
No, it's a term used to describe people who behave in an unacceptable manner and is not restricted to mental disabilities.

#Until 1973, it was an actual clinical diagnosis.
No the clinical diagnosis was removed in 1968 and had already been disregarded by many even before that. The ICD removed it in 1965.

#That's far from the 60 years you claim, and the word is still used as an insult to this day.
An insult that no longer attracts court proceedings and causes no damage.

#You need to check your neurotypical privilege, and you are permanently banned from this blog.
If anyone needs to check their privilege it's Oliver. He's making himself look foolish.

#Any further attempt to comment will result in you being killed.
This was another attempt to scare.

#I'm not gonna reveal exactly how for obvious reasons, but I will say that he literally won't know what hit him.
This is another threat and honestly I think an empty one.

#Let's take all you motherfuckers apart:
You haven't done it yet, Oliver

#1. I can't fly? That's funny, cause last time I'd checked I'd flown hundreds of times in my life. Get a clue, dude.
There is no proof of this claim.

#2. I will say this for again for the umpteenth and last time: I am not trying to scare anyone.
Yes you are.

#3. It doesn't matter what Europe used.
The anon referred to the whole world outside of the US, not just Europe.

#The fact is, the word "idiot" was in the original DSM, and was applied as a diagnosis.
Only in America.

#It has since been removed, and for very good reason.
Actually technically it hasn't. It is simply known by a different name. Retardation.

#The fact that it has been removed means that the word should not be used in any context.
That is completely wrong.

#You seem to be arguing the opposite point, and you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
No, Oliver, you are trying to delete the current meaning of "idiot" and you can't do that.

#All of you are banned.
Until the next comments are made.

#Oh I'll definitely do that.
Oliver is talking about submitting his Amendment to Donald Trump. That proves he never submitted this at the start.

#Is that a threat? I am reporting you to the police.
No it wasn't because Killah never said "I'm going to" whatever.

#I already did. They should be coming to arrest you tomorrow.
If Killah went to Oliver's blog directly from a link to the comments Oliver won't have an address.

#Killah: You are continuing to threaten me. I did call the police. I dialed 911 to report a criminal threat.
There is no proof of the 911 claim and there was no threat by Killah.

#Anon: All commenters on here are the same person. They all have the same IP address.
If they all went straight to the comments area via a direct link Oliver can not possibly know this.

#One does not need a name or address, as all I have is the IP address and the police are able to trace it based on that.
No they can't. Not without permission from the service provider and that requires a court order.

#I did not lie, and it was not an attempt to scare.
Yes it was.

#Killah was the one attempting to scare me (by threatening me with death), but I was unfazed and reported the threat to the police.
If you were unfazed, Oliver, you wouldn't have called 911. And Killah never threatened to kill you.

#I have no idea whether Killah is male or female, although I'm guessing Killah is male as females usually don't make death threats like that.
Guessing gets people into trouble.

#I don't wish rape on anyone, although if Killah is male he will likely be raped in prison.
This is another contradictory statement.

#Sir, I do not believe you are female, as your argument is simply a copout.
It wasn't, but Oliver refuses to see that.

#It is impossible for me not to see your IP address, and you are Phil Gluyas in disguise.
This was a desperate assumption that could get Oliver into trouble if he is lying and he likely is.

#If I was President, I would make sure you never have the right to commit murder, be it of me or an unborn child.
And force the child into a life of misery.

#All acts of murder should be punished with the death penalty.
Not abortion for a good reason.

#Also, transsexual females like Bruce Jenner cannot get pregnant, so your argument is a red herring.
That's Caitlyn Jenner, Oliver.

#You are a sick bastard, wanting to murder a small child who didn't do anything to you.
That is a false argument designed to protect the rapist.

#What kind of man are you? You are a murderer in waiting, and I will have you placed in four point restraints and constantly sprayed with mace until you renounce your murderous ways.
Given that there is no proof that Killah is male or female this is a dangerous comment.

#You are male and you are a murderer, because there are no female murderers except for Aileen Wuornos and she has already been executed.
Good heavens, there have been 16 women executed since 1976 for murder in America alone (including the woman he named).

#You can pretend to be female like Bruce Jenner, but that doesn't change the truth.
Caitlyn isn't pretending.

#You are going to be held hostage without bail while you await trial for attempted murder.
You have to find Killah first, and besides he or she didn't say "I'm going to kill you".

#The world cannot have psychopaths like you.
Oliver is behaving like a psychopath right now.

#No, I am not psychotic. I am perfectly sane.
No, Oliver, you are going mad.

#You are male and I am not attempting to scare you. Stop saying that.
You are trying to scare Killah, Oliver. Face it.

#You will be arrested for making criminal threats. Stop threatening my life.
Killah never did, as already stated.

This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161o

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#The world needs more people like him.
No it doesn't.

#Your statement about refusing a cure is utter hogwash.
It wasn't. It was a pertinent point.

#Autism Speaks does not promote fear either, only a cure.
It has promoted fear many times.

#I have no idea why you think they will fall if they are moving away from that, as that would be contrary to your theory.
This is a stupid comment that shows he did not understand the point being made.

#People do not want autism gone from society. They want it cured.
Same thing.

#You are dead wrong in practically everything you said.
No they were not.

#Please provide at least one link to someone saying that they are scared of autism.
The commenter provided several.

#Oh wait, that's right. You can't because it doesn't exist.
It does, as subsequently proven.

#Ruby: Oh believe me, I know. Autism is a horrible disease, and no amount of ND lies will change that fact.
Oliver is lying - again. Autism is not a disease.

#I do oppose exceptions for rape and/or incest when it comes to abortion, because I don't believe either one justifies murder.
This is an ignorant point of view.

#The unborn baby in that case is totally innocent, and does not deserve to die due to someone else's horrible deed.
This furthers the ignorant point of view.

#There of course should be punishment, but it should be against the rapist, not the unborn baby.
And aborting the baby would be part of that punishment and would save the mother mental anguish.

#Also, it is extremely unlikely that a woman could get pregnant due to rape.
That is a demonstrably false statement and very disrespectful to women.

#As Congressman Todd Akin wonderfully said, "If it's a legitimate rape, she has a way to shut that thing down."
Akin got into trouble that remark and he withdrew it.

#Direct abortion is never necessary to save a woman, and science has proven that.
This is a patently absurd observation.

#However, if a woman's life is in danger, I would support taking measures to save her life, even if the baby dies as a result.
And this remark contradicted the immediately previous statement.

#I'm sorry, but that isn't good enough.
Nothing is good enough for Oliver.

#The post is very biased from an ND perspective, and is based on unsourced secondhand and thirdhand accounts.
There is no way Oliver could know whether or not the accounts are unsourced.

#What I was looking for is a firsthand perspective of someone expressing their own fear of autism.
There are many examples of this.

#Show me that, and I may believe that one ignorant idiot has that view.
There are many "ignorant idiots" as the commenter consequently demonstrated.

#I have yet to read those links so I will get back to you later.
This was a weak excuse showing that he wasn't really interested.

#I still haven't read them, but I very much doubt these people fear autism in the way that you claim.
If he would have read them, he would have got the message, and he fears learning something he doesn't want to.

#That statement right there just ruined your credibility.
No it didn't.

#The Combating Autism Act was created to cure autism, not because of fear.
It's the same thing.

#Yes, of course cancer and AIDS should be feared as diseases, and so should autism.
Autism is not a disease - yet again.

#The Discussion is trying to frame it as a form of discrimination when that is not what it is.
It is discrimination.

#The reason that scientists are still working on a cure for autism is because it is a disease that inhibits the lives of those who suffer from it.
No it only inhibits the lives of those who allow it to inhibit them.

#It should be feared as a disease, but not in the sense of demonizing the people who have it.
This is yet another contradictory statement on either side of the comma.

#Somebody might need to look in the mirror......
Indeed, and that someone should be you.

#Discussion: I speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help me God.
That doe not make you right, Oliver. In fact it's a very obvious smoke screen.

#I have done my absolute best to remain civil with you, but you are really starting to push my patience here.
Or to put it another way, Oliver doesn't want to listen.

#My statements are of course true, and they are backed up by scientific evidence.
No they are not.

#Yours are nothing more than hyperbole, and you failed to cite a specific example that outlawing neurodiversity would lead to innocent deaths.
I rather think that "hyperbole" has been presented very well as perfectly logical and correct.

#Informer: If that idiot wants me dead, I guess I must be doing something right.
No, Oliver, it means you are seen as threatening other people, which is the wrong thing to do.

#Wow, another idiot. Someone might need a 5150.
This is another case of something Oliver himself should be subject to.

#I'm not going to respond to any of those.
This is a major win for the commenter calling themselves "Science" as the links were firm proof that Oliver is wrong.

#Once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
Once again, Oliver himself is the subject.

#No, it's not bullshit. I'm very smart. I received a high school diploma with honors.
Oliver is not smart and there is no proof that he has a diploma of any sort.

#You are wrong, and I do not need a 5150.
I think you do, Oliver.

#Plus, 5150s are for people who are insane, not mentally retarded.
They are for the gravely disabled, which can cover the mentally retarded.

#I am not insane.
That's debatable.

#From now on, anyone who questions my sanity or my intelligence will be permanently banned from this blog immediately.
That means virtually everyone was banned and this proved to be bluster.

#I have a diploma, and I am not lying. Don't you DARE accuse me of lying.
The accusation is valid.

#On March 2. Not a day earlier.
There is no valid excuse for the delay of two weeks.

#Because I don't have access to it until then, for reasons which are none of your concern.
This is an illogical comment that can easily be assumed to be a lie.

#No, I'm telling the truth. I do in fact have a high school diploma. I earned it legitimately.
There is no proof of this claim.

#It is impossible to "create" a high school diploma.
It is easy to do with a good photo shopping program.

#How dare you question my accomplishments?
In the absence of proof of said accomplishments, the question is valid.

#You have been permanently banned from this blog for daring to question the fact that I have a high school diploma.
This is a childish act.

#Do not curse at The Informer. He is right, and it is an excuse.
It's not.

#Fox Hills Mall is not within walking distance of where I live, and I have never even heard of the Zuma Corporation.
Fox Hills Mall is well within walking distance of Oliver's established home.

#Zuma is a beach in Malibu, which is more than a couple miles from my house.
The Zuma Corporation is not a beach anywhere let along Malibu.

#On a side note, my ex-girlfiriend and I did have sex inside Fox Hills Mall once.
That is impossible without a court appearance for a penal code violation.

#I sure did. Why would I lie about something like that?
Because you're an idiot.

#I am a grown man. I am 23 years old.
You aren't behaving like one, Oliver.

#I lost my virginity when I was 19.
Irrelevant, and unproven.

#Even if I was a virgin, it would not make me any less of a man. You become a man at 13 no matter what.
No you don't. There is a difference between being a physical man and a mature adult male, and Oliver is not a mature adult male.

#But honestly, let's think about this for a second. When I started this blog, I made no secret of the fact that I was still a virgin at the time, and I used it as the primary reason why I needed a cure.
It has always been said that this was a not a valid reason, primary or otherwise.

#I was always very honest, even if it didn't especially make me look good.
You were not always honest, Oliver.

#The fact that I lost my virginity without a cure (something I honestly never thought could happen), should be proof of the neurodiversity argument, and should defeat my previous argument that sex was not possible without a cure.
No it doesn't because you still want a cure, which imputes that you are still virgin.

#You guys should be claiming victory.
There is not victory when the lying continues.

#However, this proves me right in that you really don't care about autistic people at all, and you are just all about hating.
Oliver, you are the one who doesn't care about autistic people.

#You refuse to believe that I could possibly have lost my virginity not because you think it's because it's impossible for autistic people to have sex, but because you hate me simply because I tell the truth about autism.
No, people don't believe him because he is an established liar.

#If I was to lie, I would lie about still being a virgin in order to keep my original argument intact.
No you were losing that argument anyway so you changed it to try and win, and it failed.

#However, because I am very honest, I have simply modified my argument to include the fact that I was able to lose my virginity.
No I have already explained the real reason for the modification.

#It is still a problem for many autistic people, Elliot Rodger being a prime example.
Rodger was not autistic.

#Why would I go from saying autistic people can't have sex, to saying I lost my virginity? Why would I lie about that? There is no logical reason, especially since it hurts my argument and helps yours.
To try and fit in with the winning argument by removing that single losing factor, and yet keep the demand for a cure intact.

#You do not call me a jackass, and I have never lied. Please show me one instance when I lied.
There have been almost literally hundreds of occasions that Oliver has lied.

#That's right, you can't because I haven't.
We can because you have.

This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161n

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#I did not reject your comment. I have been away from this blog for a week dealing with other things going on in my life.
There is no proof of this claim.

#Yes, of course I hate autism because it is a disease. Why wouldn't I hate it?
It's not a disease.

#Hate is not born out of fear. Hatred of a disease is born out of love for the person who suffers from the disease.
Fear breeds hatred. Love and hate repel each other completely and are not related in any way.

#You make all this hyperbole about what might happen, and yet without an ounce of proof.
Logic is proof enough.

#The law can sometimes be abused, but not nearly to the extent that you are saying.
This contradicted the immediate previous comment.

#You are essentially making the USA out to be a dictatorship, which of course is not the case.
Actually from a number of viewpoints it is.

#The Second Amendment has nothing to do with this.
It has a lot to do with it. It's an excellent example of abuse of one's rights.

#The Supreme Court has overturned certain laws which are in direct violation of the amendment.
Which encouraged abuse of it.

#That is hardly abuse of the law or the constitution.
It most certainly is.

#You seem to have a rather paranoid view that everyone "fears" autism.
The anonymous commenter never said everyone feared it. Just those who hate it fear it.

#Most people I have met do not fear it, but they do realistically accept that it is a disease that must be cured.
Oliver has not met many people, and he lied in the second part of his comment.

#You also fail to cite any specific examples of lawmakers expressing "fear" of autism and passing any sort of discriminatory legislation because of it, so until then it's just hyperbole.
I think Oliver missed the point here. The fear would be expressed through lobbyists demanding lawmakers do "the right thing".

#Autism Speaks seeks to find a cure, and while they have made some videos that depict the unfortunate realities of autism, they are not trying to promote discrimination against autistic people as you suggest.
Massive protests against the more public campaigns causing them to be shut down proves this claim to be incorrect.

#Even the Autism Every Day video has a somewhat positive message, even though it accurately depicts the heartbreak that many autistic people and their families experience.
This comment is again contradictory, and the video has been removed from circulation.

#They are far from the best organization in the world, and they have done nothing but sell out to neurodiversity of late.
There is no proof of that claim.

#I won't bother to respond to your second paragraph as it's pure nonsense.
This again shows Oliver to be a coward and isn't a man of conviction.

#Your most recent comment will not be published as it is a clear threat.
Oliver did publish the comment showing that he lied again.

#I am not taking it seriously, but I must warn you that anyone showing up without permission at either my current residence or my former residence will result in the police being called.
I doubt he would do that because he doesn't have the courage to act appropriately.

#I do not want thousands of people to die, and you saying so is false.
The argument exists that he does.

#I am far more in touch with the real world than you are, and I definitely know what fear means.
No, Oliver, I don't think you do - because you live with it and don't recognize it.

#Autism and neurodiversity have nothing to do with anything that you mentioned.
Yes it does. The anonymous commenter's reflection was perfect.

#It is not a different walk of life; it is a disease.
No it is a different walk of life.

#It should be compared with cancer and AIDS and Lou Gehrig's disease, not what you mentioned.
No it shouldn't.

#Neurodiversity is not a form of diversity. It is a cult, and it must be suppressed.
It most certainly is not a cult!

#You will never find out where I live as my new address is not listed.
Oliver, you don't have a new address. 411.com and Whitepages.com show what is apparently your old address as current.

#If you do attempt to show up at my former address (which I still don't believe you will), you will indeed be arrested.
What for?

#Harassment is a crime, and is not protected by the First Amendment, and distributing "wanted" posters could be considered a threat.
I'm not an attorney, but I'm pretty sure harassment needs to be of a certain variety and direct at the victim. The proposal doesn't fulfill that criteria.

#I am not callous, and I do not want thousands of people to die.
Again, the argument exists that he does.

#On the contrary, I want to give those people life by curing them of their autism.
They have life already.

#You are not to say such a thing ever again.
That would be a violation of the First Amendment.

#You have been banned from this blog for the rest of your life.
Again - this shows Oliver to be a coward and isn't a man of conviction.

#I am not behaving like a child, and I welcome disagreement on this blog as long as it is civil.
This is an excuse that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

#I banned the previous Anon not because I disagreed with him but because he made a very clear threat.
There was no clear threat that warranted the ban, so this is a lie.

#Based on recent events, I am all but certain that there is no way he can ever touch me.
There are many in history who thought that. Hitler, Nixon, Hussein for example.

#All those anons are banned as they have done nothing but threaten me.
I have yet to see any threat except the death threats that have come from both sides.

#Anyone who actually wants to have a real discussion is welcome here.
That is a lie.

#Discussion: You do not call me a little boy. I am a grown man.
You are behaving like a little boy, Oliver.

#You are contributing to society's misperception that autistic people are perpetual children who never really grow up, something that I am fighting against.
And yet Oliver continues to prove this to be true within himself.

#If you repeat this behavior, you will lose your privilege to post here.
This is another childish act.

#I remember when Joe Scarborough made his statements, and they were after the killings of James Eagan Holmes, not Adam Lanza.
No, he made comments after the Lanza killings putting over autism as the cause of the violence.

#Holmes has schizophrenia, not autism.
This is irrelevant.

#Scarborough has a son with Asperger's, so he would be the last person to demonize autism.
And yet he did exactly that.

#He did not spread fear, nor was he even attempting to do so.
Yes he did and he was roundly criticized for this.

#He was simply bringing up the reality that many autistic people have violent tendencies, and that ignoring this fact does us no good.
And now Oliver is doing what Scarborough did – demonizing autism.

#The world needs more people like him.
No it needs less people like him and more people like Ari Ne’eman.

#Your statement about refusing a cure is utter hogwash.
I disagree.

#Autism Speaks does not promote fear either, only a cure.
The controversial “I am Autism” video says otherwise.

#I have no idea why you think they will fall if they are moving away from that, as that would be contrary to your theory.
Oliver showed here that he failed to comprehend the meaning of the comment.

#People do not want autism gone from society. They want it cured.
These two sentence completely contradict each other.

#You are dead wrong in practically everything you said.
And yet Oliver refuses to prove this.

#Please provide at least one link to someone saying that they are scared of autism.
There would be several if I had the time to look.

#Oh wait, that's right. You can't because it doesn't exist.
It does exist.

#Ruby: Oh believe me, I know. Autism is a horrible disease, and no amount of ND lies will change that fact.
And no amount of your lies will change the fact that autism is not a disease, Oliver.

#I do oppose exceptions for rape and/or incest when it comes to abortion, because I don't believe either one justifies murder.
So the mother has to live with the fact that the father of her child raped her?

#The unborn baby in that case is totally innocent, and does not deserve to die due to someone else's horrible deed.
And yet the mother’s psychological state as a result of the rape is irrelevant.

#There of course should be punishment, but it should be against the rapist, not the unborn baby.
And the mother should be punished by being forced to have the baby that resulted from a crime?

#Also, it is extremely unlikely that a woman could get pregnant due to rape.
This is demonstrably false.

#As Congressman Todd Akin wonderfully said, "If it's a legitimate rape, she has a way to shut that thing down."
No she doesn’t and Akin got into a lot of trouble for that comment – and he withdrew it.

#Direct abortion is never necessary to save a woman, and science has proven that.
This is a false statement.

#However, if a woman's life is in danger, I would support taking measures to save her life, even if the baby dies as a result.
And here we have Oliver contradicting his previous remark.

#Based on recent events, I am all but certain that there is no way he can ever touch me.
What recent events? I doubt Oliver is telling the truth about this.

#All those anons are banned as they have done nothing but threaten me.
Oliver doesn't know the difference between threats and criticism.

#Anyone who actually wants to have a real discussion is welcome here.
Many who provided a real discussion have been banned.

#Discussion: You do not call me a little boy. I am a grown man.
You aren't behaving like one. Little Boy.

#You are contributing to society's misperception that autistic people are perpetual children who never really grow up, something that I am fighting against.
You are doing a very poor job of it.

#If you repeat this behavior, you will lose your privilege to post here.
That is a childish threat.

#I remember when Joe Scarborough made his statements, and they were after the killings of James Eagan Holmes, not Adam Lanza.
This is a lie. Scarborough definitely commented in the wake of Newtown.

#Holmes has schizophrenia, not autism.
This is irrelevant.

#Scarborough has a son with Asperger's, so he would be the last person to demonize autism.
On the contrary, he did exactly that.

#He did not spread fear, nor was he even attempting to do so.
He did and he was.

#He was simply bringing up the reality that many autistic people have violent tendencies, and that ignoring this fact does us no good.
The part before the comma agrees with Scarborough's comments so Oliver is demonizing autism as well.


This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161m

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#It takes one to know one, idiot! You can tell that to the four girls that I've fucked.
There is no proof that Oliver is not a virgin.

#I'm straight and I have indeed. You're the one who's gay.
Again - reverse insults are childish and revealing.

#Um, thanks, but who are you?
Oliver at this point did not see that he was being made fun of.

#Very funny, idiot.
This proves that Oliver doesn't have a sense of humor.

#"Aquatris" does not exist.
Actually it does. It's a game. Aquatris dot com.

#Supporter, are you sure about that? I don't want to shut down my blog for no reason.
Oliver fell for another joke here in another social error.

#I'm sorry sir, but I don't think that's proof. My blog is still here.
That's not proof.

#Again, please show me proof.
Whenever proof is shown Oliver ignores it.

#1. This blog is going nowhere, dude. Thanks for showing who you really are.
There's no way Oliver can tell if the blog is safe or not.

#2. Believe me, I know that, and I recognize that. That still doesn't change the fact that autism is a disease.
These two sentences contradict each other.

#1. Disorder, disease, same difference. The point is that it's a bad thing.
A disease and a disorder are two totally different things. Autism is not a bad thing.

#2. I started this blog years ago when my life was a lot worse than it is now.
That is entirely false. There is no proof of any improvement.

#I am aware every day that I have it better than the vast majority of the world.
And yet you still complain that autism is the worst disease ever like cancer and AIDS.

#That still doesn't change the fact that I want a cure for autism, if not for myself then for the people who need it more.
You aren't getting it, Oliver.

#1. It is a disease, and it does need a cure.
It's not a disease.

#2. I am highly intelligent, and I do want a cure.
Oliver, do not claim you are highly intelligent until you show it.

#So do the vast majority of autistic people, most of whom cannot speak.
The majority of autistic people can communicate and don't want a cure.

#3. A cure for autism is indeed on the agenda of the World Health Organization.
There is no proof of this outrageous claim.

#Autism Awareness Day is celebrated every year on April 2 for this cause.
No it's not. It's celebrated for understanding.

#You're the one who's being laughed at, dude.
No, Oliver, Judge X is already right.

#Prove it.
As the anonymous person who answered this said, 90 percent of the comments are from people laughing at him.

#I still see no evidence of laughter.
Correction. Oliver doesn't want to know about the people who are mocking him, so he ignores it for convenience.

#I can and I will. One way I will win is by defeating neurodiversity.
That's impossible.

#Please tell me which innocent people will die.
All human beings.

#We both know what the real definition of neurodiversity is so please don't pull that "human race" bullshit.
You don't know the real definition, Oliver. You prefer your own warped rendition.

#They won't be killed as long as they respect my right as well as the right of other autistic people to seek a cure for themselves.
If a cure was found it would be forced by society.

#No. That's not the purpose of this amendment.
Yes it is.

#People always have the right to refuse medical treatment for themselves, even if it is stupid.
And people have been killed for making that decision.

#Neurodiversity goes over the line in that they seek to ban a cure for autism for everyone, even those who want it. That is intolerable.
No it's not it's the right thing to do.

#As far as I know, there is no one other than me who actually supports the death penalty for members of neurodiversity.
This is actually true, but it's also a major social error that he won't recognize.

#Also, simply refusing a cure for oneself is not the same as opposing it for everyone.
Yes it is because everyone who is refusing the cure knows that no one can have it as it is impossible.

#Neurodiversity would be carefully defined in statues passed by Congress after the amendment to make sure that it cannot be abused.
And the correct definition will cause widespread death.

#Also, I take great offense that you say that parents, carers, and members of society are scared of autism. That is not true.
It is true. It's why Autism Speaks has thrived. They rely on fear and have scored much money as a result.

#The people who want to cure autism do so out of love, not hate.
This is an oxymoron.

#They have seen first hand how autism has destroyed their child's life, and they want nothing but what is best for their child.
And a cure is not what's best. What's best is full scale support.

#I disagree that the widespread availability of a cure (should one become available) would cause one to be mandated, although it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing if it was.
It would be a bad thing. It would be a catastrophic thing in fact.

#Neurodiversity also strangely opposes assisted suicide for the same reason.
This is an inaccurate blanket statement.

#If anyone engages in fear mongering, it is neurodiversity.
This is demonstrably false.

#They try to generate fear that is not based on any real evidence at all, just hyperbole.
No, it is based in societal fact that they are very well versed in the logic of.

#They have shown no evidence that a cure would be a bad thing, or that it would be mandated if one was found.
The evidence lies in the fear.

#They seem to have this "we say it's true, so it's true" mentality.
This is a personal opinion expressed by Oliver that has no basis in fact.

#They also have failed to show any real evidence that assisted suicide will be abused for people with disabilities.
It uis not possible to abuse assisted suicide. To do so is not assisted suicide. It's murder.

#If anything, they should be in favor of that, as it should always be one's choice to live or die.
Autism is not a reason to die so that argument does not work.

#Also, even if a cure was mandated (which it is extremely unlikely to be), that still wouldn't be sufficient cause for the death penalty.
Yes it would.

#Only the direct denial of a cure under the guise of "neurodiversity" would be.
This is seeking to penalize an opinion, a social error of monstrous levels.

#It isn't fear. I can say that myself. I am not scared of autism, I simply want a better life for myself, with or without a cure.
This can be shown to be a lie, as Oliver has made no conscious effort to improve himself. He is scared of autism. He keeps blaming it for his problems.

#A cure does not exist, but if it did I would take it in a heartbeat.
And cause others to have to take it as well.

#My life would be a lot better.
No it would not change.

#Of course there is nothing positive about autism because it is a disease. There is nothing positive about cancer or AIDS or Lou Gehrig's disease either.
Autism is not a disease.

#The autistic people who have done well in life have done so despite their autism, not because of it.
In most instances it has been because of it.

#The love of course is for the person, not the autism. To allow a child to continue to live with autism if a cure was available would be child abuse in my opinion.
A cure won't be available so this is a moot point. A child should be loved no matter what.

#You are right that autism is very expensive for taxpayers, and that that is an incentive to find a cure
No it's an incentive to increase awareness and get donations going to the right supports.

#(although if Bernie Sanders becomes President, he will tax anything and everything).
That's Republican propaganda that has no basis in fact.

#However, if a cure was easily and readily available (which it is not currently, and likely will not be for a long time), the best the government could do would be to deny disability money to an autistic person who refused a cure, again assuming it was easily and readily available.
It would be easier to use Oliver's amendment to kill them, which is what society would want to happen. Remember, the Tea Party has said "let them die".

#The government would still be powerless to even lock them up, let alone execute them.
Your amendment would do it, Oliver.

#The Down's syndrome abortion problem has nothing to do with a cure or abuse of power.
It has everything to do with the core issue of genetic selection, which comes down to the same thing.

#It has to do with the pro-choice "woman's right to choose" bullshit.
This is irrelevant.

#I am completely pro-life, and I oppose abortion for any reason.
Even if the abortion is to save the mother's life, Oliver? Did you think of that?

#In fact, I believe anyone who receives an abortion should be given the death penalty.
This is hypocritical.

#Abortion is murder and it should be treated as such.
No it's not in many circumstances.

#Murder is not a cure. A cure is meant to give life, not take it away.
And yet you want the lives of others taken away for your petty desires.

#The Constitution is intentionally vague, as are nearly all common law documents.
The Constitution is not a common law document.

#They're meant to be interpreted by the courts.
Only one Court has that power. The Supreme Court of the United States.

#Most constitutional amendments say something like "Congress shall enforce this article via appropriate legislation" or something like that, and that is what would happen here.
And if the people demand a certain interpretation, Congress would be forced to take that by the Supreme Court.

#People would not be executed simply for refusing a cure.
Yes they would because that is what the amendment is designed to do.

#Neurodiversity goes beyond that. I also don't think that the number of autistic people consciously refusing a cure would be in the thousands either.
Yes it would. In North America alone it would be in the tens of thousands.

#Those would not be executed, but I still think they are far from innocent.
Yes they would be executed.

#The ones who callously deny a cure to those who want, need, and deserve a cure are absolutely not innocent, and are in essence denying autistic people their lives.
No they aren't. They are supporting a way of life that Oliver opposes and has no right to oppose.

#That is why it warrants the death penalty.
It doesn't warrant the death penalty at all.

This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161l

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

#Final Warning: No, you did not. You insulted me by calling me a failure.
He told the truth, and Oliver should prove how he is not a failure.

#Drew Man Group: I always have.
No you haven't, Oliver. There are many examples of this.

#Gotcha: No, because the vast majority of girls are not members of neurodiversity.
This is demonstrably false.

#Also, I am not going to fuck girls anymore. I haven't in two years, and it is time for me to move on.
This is a covert admission that Oliver is a homosexual.

#Final Warning: You were not right, you were wrong.
No, he was right.

#I do not need to dignify you by trying to pick apart your arguments. This does not make me a failure.
Yes it does because you don't have the courage of your convictions and beliefs to defend yourself.

#You are a hypocrite, as it is neurodiversity's belief that autistic people are not failures, and yet you call me one.
This is not the definition of neurodiversity.

#Please stop referring to neurodiversity as "the human race," as you know that is not the correct definition of neurodiversity and you are deliberately trying to derail my argument.
No, he is speaking the truth. Neurodiversity covers the entire human race by the correct definition.

#Even under the proposed amendment, neurodiversity is still "innocent until proven guilty" as they are still entitled to a trial.
No, Oliver, they aren't. You need to look the wording of your Amendment again.

#I do not apply a double standard to neurodiversity, but I do believe their actions should be criminalized.
That is a double standard.

#Even the name "neurodiversity" is ironic, because they are anything but diverse. They refuse to tolerate even the slightest disagreement.
The true neurodiversity tolerates all. This is why Oliver has the definition wrong.

#Tegan: Shut up you bitch. The spelling "strait" is indeed correct (e.g. Strait of Magellan).
That's not the definition you were using previously, Oliver. All sixteen times as Tegan indicated.

#Whether I spell it "strait" or "straight" does not matter as they are both correct.
No, Oliver, it depends on the context as already stated. One is correct for one context and the other is correct for the other.

#You do NOT call me a liar, and I always tell the truth.
No, Oliver, you lie wantonly.

#You are a fucking cunt, and I am going to kill you and your husband Scratcher while I am in Australia killing Phil Gluyas.
Another death threat which shows Oliver's weakness of character.

#Final Warning: I do indeed accept that I have a disease, and that it needs a cure.
Autism is not a disease.

#Neurodiversity is the one with their heads in the sand of denial about that.
No, Oliver, that is you who is in denial.

#Adam Lanza was a member of neurodiversity and look how he turned out?
Everyone is a member of neurodiversity like it or not, including you, Oliver.

#You NDs know that your argument has no weight, so you resort to the pot calling the kettle black.
The argument has plenty of merit and weight and Oliver just chooses to ignore it.

#You accuse us of certain things that you are in fact guilty of.
Oliver made this statement without giving any example.

#That would be like someone saying not to vote for Donald Trump because he supports amnesty for illegal immigrants, when in fact the exact opposite is true.
It's also like saying Oliver doesn't want to kill the whole human race with his Amendment, when in fact the exact opposite is true.

#Neurodiversity is not the whole human race.
Yes it is.

#It is the name of a group of people (both autistic and normal) who seek to ban a cure.
No it's not.

#Autistic people are not part of the human race as they are subhuman. A cure is what would make them human.
There is no such thing as subhuman. All human beings are human. No exceptions.

#The reason why NDs want a cure banned is so that gay pedophiles like Phil Gluyas, Nick Dubin, Landon Bryce, and Steve Silberman can all commit rape.
This is libel against Phil, Landon and Steve.

#I am not "running" from your arguments. I am simply not dignifying them with a response.
That's running.

#I know exactly what you are trying to do. You are trying to bait me into giving a response that you can later use against me. I'm not falling for it.
You have fallen for it. You've exposed yourself as a coward with no courage in what you believe.

#There was a time four or five years ago, back when I was still a virgin, that I would have, but not now.
I am starting to suspect that this loss of virginity was made up.

#Although my life is still pretty shitty, I at least know enough now not to "feed the troll," so to speak.
You fed the troll with your original entry, Oliver. And you did it deliberately for attention. You need help.

#You have been banned from this blog for the rest of your life.
I doubt anyone has been truly banned. I suspect that many have returned under different names and different tactics.

#1. I am dead serious. You had better believe it.
This is an admission that the death threats are true.

#2. Autism is indeed a disease and I am telling the truth.
No you are lying.

#It's not in the DSM for nothing.
The DSM has nothing to do with diseases.

#Adam Lanza did not support a cure. He was a member of neurodiversity.
No he wasn't on either count. His father stated that he rejected his diagnosis outright. Disease and otherwise.

#He specifically targeted special educators in his shooting because he was opposed to special education, which is consistent with the neurodiversity philosophy.
That is an outrageous claim.

#3. Did you just threaten to kill me? I am calling the police.
This is another case of hypocrisy.

#I'm not threatening, I'm simply stating what I'm going to do.
It's the same thing and yet another admission that the death threats are true.

#You do NOT call me a liar under any circumstances. If you do so again, you will be banned.
This is ridiculous and the stubborn conduct of Oliver continues.

#Of course Adam Lanza rejected his diagnosis. All NDs do that. They reject the scientific fact that autism is a disease.
Lanza rejected the presence of the condition full stop. There is no science that states that autism is a disease.

#Sandy Hook did indeed have special education classes. It is required to by law, as are all public schools.
No it is required to provide special education plans, or IEP's. Classes for special needs cases specifically are in fact illegal.

#The class that Lanza targeted was a kindergarten special education class that he had once been a student in.
Oliver made this up.

#Many of the students killed were autistic.
There is no proof of this.

#Ari Ne'eman and other members of ASAN and neurodiversity oppose special education, calling it "apartheid."
This is a reference to the old system of special education which has been long abandoned.

#Ari Ne'eman himself stated that his time in special education is what inspired him to establish ASAN and neurodiversity in general.
See what I just said.

#1. Accept what? If by "acceptance" they come up with some bullshit such as "autism equals genius and greatness," then I guess you're right.
It can and has if treated correctly and with respect. It's not BS at all.

#If you meant accepting the truth, then you're dead wrong.
Oliver, you are not telling the truth.

#Many ND websites (which are so near and dear to you apparently) made it very quick to point out that many victims (and not just the perpetrator) were autistic, and thus that we shouldn't demonize autistic people.
There was no mention of any of the victims of Lanza being autistic.

#Unless he has drastically changed his position, Ari Ne'eman is an opponent of special ed as it exists.
No he is not. He is an opponent of the way it was before.

#He stated that being sent to a special ed school during his junior year was the worst thing that ever happened to him.
And it shouldn't have happened and yet Oliver believes that it's the right process to use.

#He claimed that the only way he got out of it was by using his "self-advocacy" skills, hence the name of his organization.
Oliver speaks like this is a bad thing when it's not.

#He said that special ed is segregation based on disability and is a violation of civil rights.
It was and is.

#Hardly sounds like someone who supports special ed.
He does, when done correctly and in a modern manner without segregation.

#If he has changed his position, that wouldn't surprise me as it wouldn't be the first time he'd flip-flopped.
There is no proof that Ari ever "flip-flopped".

#Nowhere does it say that "all" of the victims were autistic. But many of them were. Your favorite ASAN's website said so itself. BOO YA
No it doesn't.

#Nope. Not a terrorist. Nothing like ISIS.
I rather think Oliver's radicalized conduct says otherwise.

#Krusty and I are both Jewish, so we do have that in common.
Krusty is a cartoon character and not a real person so this is a social error.

#I am not threatening violence. I am simply reminding people what will happen if they don't comply with the new law.
There won't be a new law so it is threatening violence - and death.

#I am not trying to intimidate or coerce anyone.
Yes you are.

#While autism is scientifically proven to be a disease, this is a free country.
It isn't proven at all.

#People are entitled to their own opinion, and they can reject science if they want to.
Indeed, Oliver, and you are the worst at such rejection.

#It wouldn't make them right, but they are still entitled to do so.
And they have to pay the penalty of being seen as crazed and deluded.

#Several Republicans refuse to believe in evolution or global warming even those are both scientifically proven to be true.
This is a back flip by Oliver because he has previously indicated a belief that contradicts evolution.

#However, that's not what neurodiversity is.
It is.

#Neurodiversity is the belief that nobody should be entitled to a cure (even those who want it), and that a cure should be banned.
No that is not neurodiversity.

#That is intolerable, and should be punished with the death penalty.
No, Oliver, it does not warrant any penalty because a cure would mean genocide of the whole Autistic community.

#Oh I totally know I do, Informer.
No, the Informer is wrong. Oliver does not deserve a mate.

#Just too much heartache from past relationships. Not worth getting into anymore.
A real man would not give up like this - unless they were a homosexual not interested really in women.

This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161k

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# I was never on a 5150 hold. That can be performed only by a trained, certified mental health professional, which Phil Gluyas definitely is not.
I don't believe he even tried, so this claim is unproven in all respects.

# I never spoke to the mental health department.
You should.

# Phil Gluyas got my address wrong as he does not realize that I moved.
There is no proof that you have, Oliver.

# That is why I was not home when they arrived.
This is a contradiction. Where is home again?

# I knew they had been there as they left a sheet of paper on the door which I promptly threw away.
How would you know this, Oliver, if you didn't live there?

# Even if I had spoken with them, there would be nothing they could do as I am clearly sane and do not meet the criteria for an involuntary psychiatric hold under section 5150 (it's not a penal code).
It is a penal code.

# My male therapist said as recently as today that I am clearly not insane and do not qualify for commitment.
This is further proof that there is no such person.

# He said that if anyone tries to do so, that I should contact him immediately and he can bail me out as he is a qualified therapist, and they would listen as he knows what he's talking about when he says I'm not insane.
There is plenty of evidence that Oliver is insane and any therapist who claims otherwise could well lose their license to practice.

# Anons: 1. Yes he (the male therapist) does (exist).
There is no proof of this.

# 2. Nope. Most people are on my side.
No they are not.

# I was not lying about having moved. I will not divulge the reasons why I ultimately received the note.
Of course you won't, because you lied.

# 3. You have shown the utmost ignorance about autism, and what you are saying is essentially an extension of the long debunked "refrigerator mom" theory.
Neglect has nothing to do with that theory in an extension or otherwise.

# Nonverbal people with autism cannot speak due to their autism, because it is a disease that prevents them from speaking.
No it doesn't prevent them from speaking. There are separate causes for that.

# A cure would quite literally give them a voice.
No it would not.

# 5. I can use my intelligence quite well. I received a high school diploma with honors.
There is no proof of the second claim and the first is easily demonstrably false.

# 6. You are absolutely correct. Neurodiversity is, always has been, and always will be out of hand.
It's not out of hand, Oliver. You are.

# Satanist: I have not lied, and I devoutly follow the Ten Commandments, one of which you have just posted.
No, you don't Oliver. You have threatened to kill and have guaranteed that you will kill. Thou shalt not kill is one of the Commandments.

# Perjury specifically refers to lying while under oath, so even if I did lie on this blog, it would not be perjury.
The Criminal Canby blog begs to differ on that one.

# I am not the Devil, but if I was at least the Rolling Stones would have sympathy for me.
No one has sympathy for you outside of your severely limited group of friends. It has been said by others and I agree. You are insane.

#I am not a bully nor have I ever attempted to be one.
Yes you are, Oliver. You have issued many threats unprovoked.

#In fact, I have been the victim of relentless bullying from neurodiversity, and this is my revenge factor.
There has been no bullying from "neurodiversity".

#These people seek to deny me the right to cure my own disease, which is nobody's business but mine.
No, Oliver, it is the business of the Autistic community as it threatens it.

#Curing my own autism wouldn't affect neurodiversity at all, and yet they still seek to deny me the right to a cure because they are bullies.
No it's because a cure would be forced on everyone and pre natal tests would be developed.

#This amendment has not failed, and in the end I will get the last laugh as all members of neurodiversity will be executed.
It has failed because it doesn't exist in the real world.

#The reason I have low self-esteem is because of neurodiversity, not despite them
No, Oliver, you have low self esteem because you don't care about yourself.

#No, it's not. I am not a bully as I never throw the first punch. I only retaliate. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Oliver has always thrown the first punch.

#Phil Gluyas: Shut the fuck up you faggot. I'm still going to kill you, you know.
There is no proof again that the comment was made by him, and the additional death threat doesn't help.

#Me bullying Phil? LMFAO. He's the biggest bully on earth, worse than Hitler and Osama bin Laden combined. That is why he must be taken out.
No, that is not a good reason given that there is no proof of the claim made.

#1. My amendment is not treason, merely me exercising my rights as a citizen.
It is treason technically, because it seeks to kill Americans for no good reason

#2. I am more human than all of you combined.
There is no value on being human. You either are human or you aren't.

#3. Nope, I'm not bullying. I'm merely retaliating. I never throw the first punch.
As already stated, Oliver is the bully and throwing the first punch - and multiple follow ups.

#Nope. Phil has quite literally made my life a living hell, so his punishment is more than warranted.
There is no evidence of this.

#Also his push to deny autistic individuals the cure they so desperately need and deserve is akin to denying them their life.
No, Oliver, he is not denying any Autistic their life. You are denying yourself your own life. That is your choice.

#Calling me the "Idiot of the Month" as well as the "Idiot of the Year." Calling me a "Horrid Autistic Adult" multiple times.
Opinions do not warrant the death penalty. That is penalizing Freedom of Speech.

#Writing libelous articles about me on various online encyclopedias.
There is no proof of this.

#Suing me twice and getting a fraudulent judgment against me and now I owe him $54,000.
There is no proof of a second lawsuit, and the first on face value was far from fraudulent.

#Falsely calling the FBI and Mental Health department on me.
Given Oliver's criminal activity and his obvious madness the calls would not be false.

#The list goes on and on. He must pay for it with his life.
No he must not as such reasoning is not valid.

#Frankly, I think the death penalty is warranted in this case.
No it is not.

#Phil Gluyas simply doesn't learn, which is why he must be taken out.
No, Oliver, it is you who is refusing to learn.

#Informer: Do you know which MP currently serves as AG in Australia? I know you guys have a different government system than we do. Is it possible that they would allow me to enter the country carrying either an M16 or an AK-47 under the pretense that I was going dingo hunting? I guess being deported is better than being jailed, though.
I doubt a country like Australia would allow such weapons in for any reason given their gun laws.

#Anons: That link actually does look promising. I'll see what I can do.
The link will be useless because it's a complaint form about mental health service provision. There is no proof that anyone is using that service.

#I am actually in the process of saving up enough money to eliminate Phil Gluyas.
Publicly admitting this is a serious social error as well as adding truth to the threat.

#Tylenol is a lethal drug. No thank you.
It most certainly is not! It's a pain, fever and symptomatic reliever and nothing more.

#I am not insane, thank you very much.
There is rather a lot of proof to the contrary about, as the reference to Del Amo Hospital in Torrance demonstrates.

#It is if what you're doing is dangerous.
What is being done is not dangerous.

#I am not insane.
Oliver has not proved this yet.

#The death penalty will be enforced as soon as the amendment is ratified.
There is no Amendment.

#Owning a gun is my constitutional right, and I am very brave.
It is not brave to issue death threats.

#I am permitted to leave the house unsupervised.
I rather think to comment meant that you can't leave the United States unsupervised

#Go fuck yourself. You do NOT call me a jerk!!!!!!
This is an over reaction and says a lot about Oliver's state of mind.

#I am not trying to scare anyone; I'm simply stating what I'm going to do.
This is a contradictory remark, designed to scare.

#I guess Phil will be even more surprised when he gets a bullet in his brain.
I doubt he will even though there's no indication of any action.

#Fuck you, motherfucker.
This was in reply to being called a jerk five times in one sentence as a joke. Incorrect reaction, Oliver.

#What do you mean?
This is an interesting reply to being asked directly if his threats were true. Does he know?

#I have no idea what either of you are talking about.
Yes you do, Oliver.

#Do not curse at me you fucking asshole. What a son of a bitch you are.
This is extreme hypocrisy.

#It is my 5th Amendment right not to answer that question.
This was a stupid response given what he has previously stated and has not deleted. This is therefore a confession.

#You go, Informer! He's a stupid idiot, but that's nothing new. He'll get his comeuppance one way or another.
The only person who will get their comeuppance one day, Oliver, is you.

#As for you, anon, you NEVER call me a coward under any circumstances.
First Amendment, Oliver. Freedom of speech.

#You do NOT call me a jerk you motherfucker! You have been permanently banned from this blog.
Banned for calling him a jerk? That is the most incredible over reaction in history.

#1. It is not cowardly to exercise one's constitutional rights.
And yet you punish people for exercising theirs.

#2. Right back at you, fuckwad.
This is a childish response to being told he needs help.

#3. You do NOT call me a hyena. That is extremely racist.
It most certainly is not! That is another incredible over reaction.

#Sir, you could not be more wrong. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
Not according to your proposed Amendment, Oliver.

#The Constitution is to protect the innocent (like me), and to condemn the guilty (like members of neurodiversity).
And you have already judged the "guilty", Oliver.

#Hyena is racist because it is an African animal.
So? How does that explain it being racist? It doesn't.

#Anon: That is why they are still entitled to a trial, even under the new amendment.
This is presumptive. The Amendment as it stands by passes the trial.

#Drew Man Group: I am straight.
There is no proof either way.

#Final Warning: You are wrong about pretty much everything you said.
He wasn't. It was a fine commentary.

#However, you do NOT call me a failure. That is extremely insulting and offensive. You had better apologize right now.
No, Oliver, he doesn't have to apologize because he was right. You are a failure.

This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161j

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# I forgot, I just added a third section to the amendment. It reads as follows:
You can't do that, Oliver - notwithstanding that there is no Amendment.

# 3. Anyone in Australia who supports, partakes in, or engages in neurodiversity shall be extradited to the United States, and be beheaded without the benefit of a trial.
The US Constitution has no power over residents of Australia.

# That means you, fuckwit. You are going to DIE. And you know what? I've had enough. I am going to kill you.
This is a blatant and direct death threat on the back of incitement three years ago.

# I will use my recently purchased gun, and I will simply tell Australian customs agents that I am going dingo hunting.
Australia is known for strong gun laws and upon investigation I found that the importation of an AK-47 would be impossible.

# Just as some perform a citizen's arrest, I will perform a citizen's execution.
There is no such thing.

# You are the worst person on earth, worst than Hitler and Osama bin Laden combined. I will be a hero when I kill you.
No you won't, you will be a convicted murderer.

# You have committed crimes against humanity, and you deserve the death penalty.
There is no proof of this.

# Thousands of little boys will be safe when you are dead because you won't be able to rape them anymore.
This is again proven to be defamatory.

# My male therapist knows that I plan to kill you, and he says that it's totally ok.
No therapist would ever approve of such a plan.

# You cannot prank call the mental health agency again because my therapist is on my side.
That would make no difference.

# Also, I no longer live at my former address (I'm not giving you my new one), which is why I thankfully wasn't home when they showed up last time due to your fraudulent call.
There is no proof of this claim.

# You have made my life a living Hell, and you will pay for it with your life.
No, Oliver, you have made your own life like that.

# I realize that calling for your death is not possible (the FBI thwarted that plan last time), so I must carry it out myself.
No you must not. What you must do is stop lying and defaming people and lying about Autism and neurodiversity.

# I wouldn't care if I had to spend the rest of my life in prison.
Yes you would.

# The only thing that could possibly deter me is the death penalty.
That shows an awareness that he knows he is doing wrong and yet is doing it anyway.

# Thankfully, Australia is such a backwards nation that it abolished the death penalty over 30 years ago.
That's not backwards. That's progressive.

# If I make it back to US soil, I will be a free man.
No you won't. You'll serve your time in prison.

# If I am caught before I arrive at the airport, so be it.
Hopefuly he will, and with this notice given I am pretty sure he will.

# Any prison sentence would be offset by the immense happiness that your death would cause me.
And your happiness would be offset by the knowledge that you will lose your family's respect.

# I will take great pride at each bullet I fire into your body until you die.
This is vulgar and sick.

# Also, you cannot call the police on me this time, as the Supreme Court has ruled in Elonis v. United States that threatening to kill someone is constitutionally protected free speech.
No they didn't.

# I am simply exercising my First Amendment rights, and the Supreme Court says so.
In that instance, no they didn't.

# So there is nothing you can do about it, Phil Gluyas.
I feel sure there is plenty he can do about it and I hope he does.

# You are going to DIE, motherfucker, and the world will be a better place as a result.
Oliver, the world will be a better place if you would just be quiet.

# Phil Gluyas: Please stop posing as a Hawaiian.
There is no proof of this claim.

# I am still coming to Australia to kill you, and saying so is my constitutional right. Enough said.
And it can get you arrested and convicted of criminal threats.

# You go, Ruby! Show everyone that he's the bastard we already know him to be.
There is no proof of this claim.

# Yes, you are indeed Phil Gluyas. And you are going to die.
Again, there is no proof and another threat of death.

# That really sucks. I could've sworn that was Phil Gluyas because nobody else talks that way.
Many people talk that way, and the commenter was using American spelling, not Australian/English.

# Are you sure he wasn't using a proxy?
This is paranoid.

# That's a good point. I guess he did spell "color" without the u. I'm so used to seeing words spelled the American way that I don't bother to think twice.
That's your problem, Oliver. You don't think at all.

# Phil Gluyas: You are about as much of a woman as Bruce Jenner, although it makes sense that you'd become a Trans Gendered person as your father is one and so is your husband Lee.
It's Kaitlyn Jenner, Oliver, and there is no proof of that outrageous claim about Phil's family.

# This is quite dreadful, as many men claim to be trans in order to use the lady's restroom and molest children.
There is no proof of this claim.

# While I know that you already rape little boys, it would not surprise me if you preyed on girls as well.
This is defamatory again.

# I remember one time that John Best rightfully called you out when you made a sexual pass online at a 16-year-old Japanese girl, so I definitely think it could be true.
There is no proof of such a claim.

# The fact that you are a gay rapist like Jerry Sandusky, and now a trans pedophile to boot is cause for great concern, and justifies your death even more.
No it doesn't and besides this is proven defamation again.

# Now to take apart the rest of your bullshit. A cure is indeed a service, and a priceless one at that.
No it's not, it's murder.

# It is not a denial of God's work.
It is.

# Would you say that about curing cancer or AIDS or Lou Gehrig's disease? Yeah, I didn't think so.
Of course not because unlike Autism they are diseases that can kill.

# Autism is a disease, just like those three.
No it is not.

# It is definitely not a part of being human.
Yes it is.

# In fact, it can and does prevent people from being fully human, and that is truly tragic.
Nothing prevents a person from being fully human.

# "Diversity" is simply a code word for affirmative action, which autism definitely is not.
No it's a practical statement of fact.

# Neurodiversity is a cult against curing autism run by gay pedophiles such as Phil Gluyas, Nick Dubin, Landon Bryce, and Steve Silberman.
That is again defamation against Phil, and also Landon and Steve. Dubin of course is a convicted pedophile.

# The reason they don't want autism cured is simple: more nonverbal autistic boys equals more "perfect victims."
This is utter nonsense.

# That is quite sickening, and is the primary reason why neurodiversity must be outlawed.
No it is not a reason because the reason does not exist.

# Research into a cure does not divert funds from services, and not all services can offer improvement for everyone.
All services offer improvement and research into a cure does divert funds.

# The CDC wouldn't track stats for autism if it wasn't a disease.
Yes they would because it is a mental health consideration for which the CDC has jurisdiction.

# Like I said before, it's not the Center for Difference Control.
Actually it is in a way.

# I do in fact have a male therapist, and he is in full agreement with me that you need to die.
Again, this has to be a lie.

# If he thought I was unstable, he would be obligated to report me to the authorities.
And the fact that he hasn't lends itself to the beliefe that there is no male therapist.

# Thankfully, he understands the truth, which is why your prank call to the mental health agency fell on deaf ears.
There is no proof of this.

# I have been seeing him for nearly five years, and I owe a lot of my success to him.
What success?

# For example, I was still a virgin when I started seeing him, thinking that I would never get pussy due to my autism.
And there is no proof that you have, Oliver.

# He was able to convince me that that wasn't the case, and I lost my virginity only months after I started seeing him despite my autism.
Again, there is no proof of this.

# I am fully aware of the truth, unlike you. The truth is that autism needs to be cured, and you need to die.
The truth is that autism does not need a cure and no one needs to die.

# I suggest you go try and live whatever you have left of your life, as the exact time and date of my trip to Australia to kill you will be kept secret for obvious reasons.
I suggest, Oliver, that you check yourself in to hospital immediately. This is disgusting.

# Get off the Internet and stop attacking people.
Take your own advice, Oliver.

# Go out and actually do something.
According to his website he does, and a lot more than Oliver does.

# And no, raping little boys on the Australian rules football diamond like Jerry Sandusky and suing people does not count as doing something.
The last one does count, and one more thing. Upon investigation Australian rules football is not played on a diamond. That's baseball.

# I'm still not convinced. I mean, how many people believe the same crazy shit he does?
As someone else quickly added, everyone believes the same thing Hono-Lulu does except for Oliver and his friends.

# Nope, you're wrong. The truth is that neurodiversity is bad. Every sane person knows that.
Every sane person knows that neurodiversity represents all members of the human race.

# Anons: Nope. I tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help me God.
No you don't, Oliver. You are a barefaced liar.

# I am not an idiot. I am quite smart, and my IQ is 146.
You're not showing those IQ points, Oliver.

# Neurodiversity is definitely not cool.
Of course it's cool.

# Many Germans thought Nazism was "cool" and look how that turned out.
Actually most of them didn't. They were just too scared to fight it until the Third Reich was destroyed by the Allies.

# I'm trying to put a damper on neurodiversity before it gets too out of hand.
You'll never achieve that, Oliver. There is too much opposition.

# Matt Hogan: I am not insane. I'm definitely not a jerk, and neurodiversity is horrible.
All of this is demonstrably incorrect.

# Thankfully, most people are on my side.
No they are not.

# They just can't speak and are being mercilessly taken advantage of by neurodiversity, sexually and otherwise.
No, Oliver, you are hurting them.


This assistance shall continue.

Assistance Package 161i

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;


# You do NOT call me a cunt. That is intolerable.
No it's not. Vulgar, yes, but not intolerable.

# For that, I am going to kill you.
And another death threat. That's a total of five now.

# I have already purchased an AK-47 and I am going to use it to end your life.
Such a weapon is used only by enemies of the United States, given that it originated in the Soviet Union.

# You can Google both of them. They are members of the California state bar.
A check reveals that this is not the case at all.

# Yes, my father does practice in Beverly Hills.
There is no proof of this.

# My mother has a different surname than I do.
Unless there has been a divorce (for which there is no indication) this is not possible.

# You have no fucking clue what you're talking about, asshole.
Abuse doesn't make your claim true, Oliver.

# Everything I have said is the God's honest truth, and you do not own a gun.
The first claim is demonstrably false and the second is an assumption with no proof.

# After the Elliot Rodger shooting, the California state legislature passed a law making it illegal for anyone with autism or Asperger's to purchase a firearm, and the bill was signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September of last year.
The changes made in September 2014 did not include this rubbish claim, and if it was true Oliver could not own an AK-47.

# You need to be institutionalized for the sake of society.
No, Oliver, that will be you if you continue on this path.

# Go suck a dick, faggot.
A cheap insult.

# Gov. Brown signed the concealed weapon bill long before the Elliot Rodger shooting.
This is a lie. Brown signed this bill this past October.

# Completely different law.
Not to the law the anonymous person was pointing to it isn't.

# You have admitted to owning a gun, which is a crime here in California.
No it's not, unless certain criteria isn't fulfilled. Otherwise it would violate the second Amendment.

# I will be reporting you to the California Department of Game and Fish, and they will arrest you for illegal weapons possession.
Oliver that is the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and they have no jurisdiction over this matter. It was Fish and Game until the end of 2012.

# Have fun getting assraped in prison, fuckwit.
Another stereotype uttered by this poor excuse for a human being.

# Nope. I have never committed a crime in my life.
The Criminal Canby blog says otherwise.

# Nope. Owning a gun is protected under the 2nd Amendment, and free speech (including death threats) are protected under the 1st Amendment.
Death threats are not protected by the First Amendment as they are criminal threats.

# No, I'm not a hypocrite. Is that a threat?
Yes you are, Oliver, and there was no threat.

# Owning a gun is a crime if you have Asperger's.
As previously stated, this is a rubbish claim.

# Gov. Brown signed the legislation after the Elliot Rodger shooting.
As previously stated this was not the case.

# The Constitution does not apply to people with Asperger's, as it only applies to humans and autistic people are fully subhuman.
This is an extremely bigoted and irrational statement.

# I am definitely not a hypocrite. Making a contradictory statement does not make one a hypocrite. A hypocrite is one who preaches one thing yet practices another.
Which is exactly what you are doing, Oliver.

# Matt Hogan: Did you just call me a germ-filled monster? Look who's talking now.
I rather think the world would agree with Matt Hogan at this point.

# Anon: I am not a criminal, and I have never been convicted, tried, or even arrested.
Just because he hasn't been tried doesn't mean he isn't a criminal. There are many criminals who are yet to be caught.

# I'm not a hypocrite, and I do follow the law.
You don't, Oliver. Death threats are against the law.

# U am far from a bigot, simply a realist.
There is a clear typo here. Being a realist is a low excuse for being a neurobigot.

# There is such a thing as being subhuman. Why don't you take a look in the mirror and you'll know what I'm talking about.
That's advice that you should take yourself, Oliver

# Patriot: I am not a Communist. I am a member of the Republican party.
Both major political parties have been infiltrated by Communists in the past.

# As I have said multiple times before, I am not a Communist.
The more you deny it, Oliver, the more true it becomes.

# A gun cannot possibly have a political ideology as it is an inanimate object.
The AK-47 does.

# Anon: Convicted of what? Oh wait, nothing? That's right.
No, wrong. As the Criminal Canby blog ably demonstrates as has already been mentioned.

# You're delusional, dude. Get yourself the help you so desperately need.
Oliver, that is you that you are describing.

# Patriot: Russia hasn't been Communist since 1991.
This is not true. Russia remains Communist to this day, albeit a different version.

# That's before I was even born. Although I am not a Communist, being one is protected under the First Amendment.
No it's not. Communism remains contrary to American freedom and it's second worst enemy after Islamic State.

# I have not threatened anyone, and I don't have possession of any type of illegal weapon.
You have, Oliver, and you said you owned an AK-47 - which is an illegal weapon.

# Anon: It is not illegal. It is protected under the 2nd Amendment, as are all guns.
Not the AK-47. It's a weapon used by terrorists and revolutionaries.

# Those statements are not criminal threats; merely constitutionally protected free speech.
No, they were direct criminal threats.

# The Supreme Court actually ruled that to be true this year.
No they didn't.

# Patriot: It sure is. Any religion, philosophy, or political belief is covered, no matter how abhorrent it may be.
Communism isn't.

# Patriot: Very funny. I can always use a good laugh.
In fact, a visit from the military would be consistent with possession of a terrorist weapon, so don't laugh.

# Anons: Talk about a threat. Someone might need to go the psych ward........
Yes, Oliver, you do.

# You are both idiots. You NEVER tell another human to commit suicide. EVER.
And yet you are claiming that believing in neurodiversity is suicide in effect. Inconsistent as always.

# For someone who claims to be an ND, you sure are a hypocrite for supporting the Judge Rotenberg Center.
There is no proof that the statement made was by a supporter of neurodiversity.

# To the anon whose comment I accidentally rejected earlier, threats to kill are constitutionally protected free speech.
No they are not.

# Google Elonis v. United States if you don't believe me.
And read it properly, Oliver.

# 1. Saying everyone is ND is like saying that all blacks are Democrats. It's simply not true.
Bad comparison as usual.

# 2. If you tell someone to commit suicide, and they do it, you can be charged with manslaughter.
Only if the instruction is malicious.

# You have been permanently banned from commenting on this blog.
Oh dear another act of denial of the First Amendment.

# Although you very cleary are a member of neurodiversity, I most certainly am not, as I have accepted the fact that autism is a horrendous disease that needs to be cured.
No, Oliver, that is a misnomer and a lot of lies as well about Autism.

# Thankfully the 28th Amendment is pending, which will criminalize neurodiversity and will mandate the death penalty for all members.
No it is not pending at all.

# 1. No, it's not. Only if it can be proven that it was a murder for hire.
This again is not true.

# 2. No, you have a fundamental misunderstanding what "neurodiversity" means.
Oliver, you are distorting the true meaning of neurodiversity to suit your own warped agenda.

# It doesn't mean "brain difference" as its etymology would imply. Of course everyone's brain is different. That's nothing new.
That is neurodiversity as it was originally coined in the 1990's.

# What neurodiversity really means is enacting a ban on a cure for autism, at the expense of those so low-functioning that they cannot live without a cure.
That is completely false and scaremongering of a very sick kind.

# Denying a cure to someone with a severe disease like autism is a human rights abuse, and should be punished with the death penalty.
Autism is not a disease, and to call it a disease is a human ights abuse.

# Phil Gluyas: I DO KNOW EVERYTHING
You don't, Oliver, and there is no proof that the comment was from that person.

# You are wrong about neurodiversity, you god damn cocksucking faggot!
Why is it that when Oliver is angry he uses homophobic abuse?

# I do indeed support services for autistic people, including a cure. Supporting a cure does not mean opposing services.
Yes it does because it means there are no services available to help those with Autism as all the money is going where it shouldn't be going.

# The two are not mutually exclusive.
Yes they are.

# It will not change no matter how many times you lie about it you disgusting pedophile.
I happen to know thanks to a January court decision that this is proven to be defamatory.

# Autism is indeed a disease, and is identified as such by the CDC.
No it is not.

# It isn't the Center for Difference Control. It has nothing to do with skin color, hair color, eye color, or gender.
It has.

# Those are differences, not diseases.
Yes, and Autism is a difference.

# Autism is a disease, and you calling it merely a "difference" trivializes the horrible illness that it is.
It is not an illness at all.

# But you would rather little boys remain autistic so you can rape them on the Australian rules football diamond, huh?
That is another proven defamatory statement if I remember.

# The real world, which you are not a part of, rightly believes that autism is a disease, and is working on discovering a cure.
This is again completely false.

# The amendment will not kill the human race, only neurodiversity.
Killing neurodiversity means killing the whole human race.

This assistance shall continue

Assistance Package 161h

This is a continuation of the previous entry concerning the one hundred and sixty-first entry that continued the lies and errors;

# Zexcoiler Kingbolt: So you’re Latino then, huh? I bet you don’t even speak a word of Spanish
Another presumptive remark.

# Lyle: You are indeed Phil Gluyas commenting under a different name. Go suck a dick, faggot.
There is no proof of either claim and it was also very childish.

# Zexcoiler Kingbolt: Yeah, it kinda pisses me off that I can’t type accents too. I can on my phone, though.
There are ways around that so this is a social error.

# Do not call me a son of a bitch. I have a very good education, and that is actually how I learned to speak Spanish fluently.
There is no proof that Oliver can speak Spanish fluently, and I think we know he does not have a good education.

# If you really are Latino, you should’ve spoken Spanish from birth, not learned it in school like I did.
That's another presumptive remark.

# I’m white, so I get a pass for that.
That is tantamount to reverse racism.

# Something needs to be done about that bastard. He can’t keep getting away with all his bullshit anymore.
This reads like a threat, although this isn't a death threat as per previously.

# I’m only asking this because my ex-girlfriend is a native Spanish speaker and she didn’t speak a word of English until she was in 6th grade.
There is no proof of the claim that Oliver has an ex girlfriend that fits this description.

# I only recently got a comment from that user; I hadn’t deleted any previous comment by someone of that name.
The new blog says otherwise. A comment from someone under that name was indeed deleted.

# I won’t publish the comment as that user is clearly just looking for trouble.
As proven by the new blog, all they are doing is calling Oliver out. Oliver is the one making trouble.

# People tell me that I speak Spanish very well for someone who learned it as a second language.
There is no proof of this claim.

# That’s exactly what my ex said, which is why she was so impressed that I could actually speak Spanish for real.
If this was true, why is she an ex now? For this reason I call this claim unproven also.

# I think I held my own against them pretty well, actually.
No, Oliver, as the anonymous person observed they were destroying you.

# However, everyone who is part of that cult against me is now permanently banned from this blog.
I don't think that makes a difference. The damage has been done.

Oliver did make one more comment accusing the anonymous commenter of arguing for the sake of arguing and insisting that he won the argument - against all sense and logic. However he deleted it before I could record it, and he deleted all the other comments he made from this package. But he soon returned;

# Then you must be a member of neurodiversity. Have fun being executed!
There will be no executions.

# I'm not on a "killing kick," and I won't be the one performing the executions.
This doesn't matter. Oliver wants people to die. He just doesn't want to do it himself.

# They will be performed by a licensed executioner under the law.
No they won't, because there won't be any.

# Executing someone is a very solemn duty, and those tasked with performing it certainly don't get any kicks out of it.
It shouldn't be happening no matter what.

# No, I actually don't want people to die. In fact, it pains me that these people will have to be executed.
It is safe to say that this is a complete fabrication.

# But committing a crime as horrible as neurodiversity deserves the ultimate punishment.
No it doesn't.

# DLeeHarley: Your comments make no sense. Please specify what you mean.
I can answer that. He believes that Oliver should be executed.

# Anon #1: You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of my intention.
No he understood it very well.

# I do not plan to kill anyone myself, as I am not an officer of the law and do not intend to become one.
As already stated, this does not matter.

# The executions will be carried out by a licensed executioner at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, and by no one else and at no other location.
There will be no executions.

# Also, my proposed amendment is not intended to criminalize being brain damaged.
Yes it does.

# On the contrary, I have the utmost sympathy for those people and am on their side in the fight against neurodiversity.
The brain damaged are neurodiverse, so no you are not on their side at all.

# Also just FYI, neurodiversity strongly rejects referring to autism as "brain damage," so I can't really tell if you're one of them or not.
Autism isn't, but untreated regressions are.

# Anon #2: I do, in fact, seek to educate.
This is laughable because all he has done is educate us in his foolishness and nothing else.

# That is what I have been doing on this blog for the past five and a half years.
No you haven't, Oliver.

# If someone was willing to renounce neurodiversity, that would definitely be grounds for a pardon or commutation.
No one will renounce neurodiversity and there is no reason to punish anyone for believing in it.

# In my opinion, neurodiversity should be a crime and should warrant the death penalty.
No it should not in either respect.

# That would be good.
Making Autism illegal, which is what this is in reply to, would not be good at all.

# I still think that denying someone a cure is akin to denying them their life, which is why I think it warrants the death penalty.
This insinuates that Autism kills, which it does not.

# Yuval actually is a proud supporter of Donald Trump.
That's a bad thing, not a good thing.

# Do you know something that I don't? There's no evidence at all that "neurodiversity" was the target of the San Bernardino shooting, and you saying that I incited it is libel.
The attack was on a facility for the developmentally disabled, which would have included people with Autism. The assertion is valid - correct or not.

# Although I would prefer firing squad as a method of execution, the Supreme Court has held that it violates the 8th Amendment, so lethal injection will have to do.
It won't do, at all.

# No, it doesn't. The Supreme Court has held multiple times that the death penalty is constitutional, which is why it is still legal.
In many circumstances the death penalty is not constitutional.

# That is why the Constitution must be amended to allow it, and I have proposed such an amendment to fix that.
No it must not be amended to allow the murder of innocent people.

# Anon: You're wrong, and you're incredibly stupid. I feel bad for how dumb you are.
Oliver looks lame for making this statement.

# A constitutional amendment cannot possibly be found unconstitutional because it is an AMENDMENT.
It has already been explained to Oliver that this is not the case.

# It literally changes what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional.
It's rather more complex than that simplistic assumption.

# Under your perverse logic, the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional because it violates the three-fifths compromise clause.
It's not.

# Honestly, you need to grow a brain.
Oliver is the one who needs this function.

# Troy Mullane: I am going to come to your house and kill you. You are going to die, motherfucker!
Another death threat. This is pathetic.

# You are a disgusting Abo who has no place on this earth, and your existence is in clear violation of the White Australia policy.
A brief Google search reveals that the White Australia policy was abolished well before Oliver was even born.

# Anon: Quite the contrary. The pot is calling the kettle black. You are the one making a fool of yourself, and you likely aren't even from this country.
There is no proof of this claim.

# The word amendment means change, so yes, it literally changes the Constitution.
No it adds to it.

# It is not simply a new law. The Supreme Court cannot find a constitutional amendment to be unconstitutional.
Yes it can. That is it's job, to interpret the Constitution and correct anomalies.

# Scratcher: Syncompac is in fact Troy Mullane. The Informer says so. Therefore, it must be true.
There is no proof of this claim either.

# You're an idiot. First of all, nothing can be "struck out" in the United States. That's a British term.
It's a legal term, which applies in all countries.

# Only a baseball player can be struck out.
And a law or constitutional change that is unconstitutional.

# What you mean to say is overturned, but that is not possible as I have said before.
It is possible.

# The 14th Amendment is specifically what overturned the three-fifths compromise.
No, nothing overturned it.

# It gave black peoples full citizenship, whereas they had previously only counted as three fifths of a person in the census.
That was the census and the census only.

# The Supreme Court has no power to overturn a constitutional amendment.
Yes they do.

# If my proposed amendment is ratified, it shall become law and there's nothing you can do about it.
No it can be challenged and struck out as unconstitutional.

# The only way an amendment can be repealed is via another constitutional amendment, as the 18th Amendment was via the 21st Amendment.
And by a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States stating that an Amendment is unconstitutional.

# You are just so stupid, dude. Get help. Seriously.
I rather think that Oliver is talking about himself. Seriously.

# Not true. Nobody in the US says "struck out" unless they're talking about baseball.
This is demonstrably false.

# Maybe "struck down," but never "struck out."
This is also demonstrably false.

# Overturn can refer to a lower court's decision, or to a piece of legislation being found unconstitutional.
And an Amendment that is equally unconstitutional.

# Both my parents are lawyers and I have sufficient legal knowledge from them.
Such knowledge is not inherited, and there is no proof of the initial claim anyway.

This assistance shall continue.